Study on the Uniaxial Compression Constitutive Relationship of Wood Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer

Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites demonstrate significant advantages in the reinforcement of timber structures, with basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) exhibiting distinct characteristics. This study systematically compares the mechanical performance differences between BFRP- and CFRP-reinforced Northeast larch timber columns. Uniaxial compression tests focused on the mechanical responses under different reinforcement conditions along the grain direction. The results indicate that BFRP-reinforced specimens exhibit superior cost-effectiveness, enhanced ductility, and improved damage tolerance, whereas CFRP-reinforced specimens demonstrate higher stiffness and ultimate load-bearing capacity. A damage constitutive model, developed based on Poisson distribution theory, accurately describes the damage evolution process of fully FRP-reinforced Northeast larch timber columns. Numerical simulations show excellent agreement with experimental results. The study provides critical guidance for FRP material selection and reinforcement strategies in timber structure engineering: BFRP is more suitable for general applications prioritizing cost efficiency and ductility, while CFRP is better suited for special structures requiring higher load-bearing capacity. Finite element models of CFRP- and BFRP-reinforced timber specimens under axial compression were established using ABAQUS 2020 software, with simulation results closely matching experimental data. The proposed constitutive model and finite element analysis method offer a reliable tool for predicting the mechanical behavior of FRP-wood composite structures.