Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

4.6K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
4.6K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

4.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
4.4K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

60
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
60
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

1.3K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.3K
Force Classification01:22

Force Classification

1.0K
Forces play a crucial role in the study of physics and engineering. They are essential in describing the motion, behavior, and equilibrium of objects in the physical world. Forces can be classified based on their origin, type, and direction of action.
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
1.0K
Extraction: Advanced Methods00:56

Extraction: Advanced Methods

388
Metal ions can be separated from one another by complexation with organic ligands–the chelating agent– to form uncharged chelates. Here, the chelating agent must contain hydrophobic groups and behave as a weak acid, losing a proton to bind with the metal. Since most organic ligands used in this process are insoluble or undergo oxidation in the aqueous phase, the chelating agent is initially added to the organic phase and extracted into the aqueous phase. The metal-ligand complex is...
388

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The dual role of ATF4 in neurons: from stress adaptation to therapeutic intervention.

Frontiers in molecular neuroscience·2026
Same author

S100A10 promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma by regulating JUND/TNC axis-mediated EMT.

Translational oncology·2026
Same author

Quantitative CT-Derived extrapulmonary body composition and the risk of acute exacerbations in COPD: A prospective cohort study.

Respiratory medicine·2026
Same author

Inhibition of Raly promotes oligodendrocyte precursor cell differentiation and remyelination after chronic hypoperfusion.

Neural regeneration research·2026
Same author

Disasters weaken the synergy effects among the global Sustainable Development Goals.

iScience·2026
Same author

DeDiAttack: Enhancing Transferability of Unrestricted Adversarial Examples via Deformation-Constrained Diffusion.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

428

Robust Adversarial Example Detection Algorithm Based on High-Level Feature Differences.

Hua Mu1, Chenggang Li2,3, Anjie Peng4

  • 1College of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, China.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 28, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new adversarial example detection algorithm using high-level feature differences (HFDs). The method enhances robustness against various attacks and preprocessing, improving deep learning security.

Keywords:
adversarial example detectionfeature differencesfeature encoderrobustnesssimilarity measurement model

More Related Videos

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.6K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

428
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

42.6K
Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Adversarial examples (AEs) pose a significant threat to deep learning models.
  • Existing detection algorithms' accuracy is often compromised by attack characteristics and image preprocessing.
  • The impact of preprocessing on detection robustness remains under-explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel adversarial example detection algorithm robust to both attacks and preprocessing.
  • To enhance the reliability of deep learning systems against sophisticated adversarial threats.
  • To address the overlooked influence of image preprocessing on detection performance.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel detection algorithm based on high-level feature differences (HFDs).
  • Employs an encoder to extract high-level features from test and counterpart training images.
  • Classifies images as adversarial if feature similarity is low, exploiting semantic conflicts.

Main Results:

  • The HFD-based method demonstrated significant improvements over FS, DF, and MD detection algorithms.
  • Achieved detection accuracy comparable to the ESRM method.
  • Exhibited superior robustness against preprocessing operations like downsampling and common corruptions.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed HFD-based algorithm offers high detection accuracy across diverse attacks while maintaining resilience to preprocessing.
  • The method is applicable to various target models, providing a valuable new perspective for adversarial example detection.
  • This research highlights the importance of considering preprocessing in the design of robust defense mechanisms.