Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Characterizing the Design of and Emerging Evidence for Health Care Organization-Based Lung Cancer Screening
Jennifer Elston Lafata1,2, Katharine A Rendle3, Jocelyn V Wainwright3
1UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Implementing lung cancer screening (LCS) requires multifaceted interventions beyond education. Current strategies focus on shared decision-making and initial uptake, but gaps remain in supporting eligibility assessment and adherence to screening protocols.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
- Oncology
Background:
- Implementing lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) involves complex steps from eligibility assessment to follow-up adherence.
- Existing evidence supporting LDCT screening implementation remains unclear, necessitating a review of current interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review interventions that facilitate the initiation, adoption, or improvement of LCS programs within healthcare organizations.
- To identify effective strategies across the LCS continuum, including risk assessment, shared decision-making (SDM), and adherence to screening and diagnostic testing.
Main Methods:
- Conducted librarian-assisted literature reviews of studies published between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2023.
- Included interventions focused on any LCS process step before diagnosis, utilizing databases like CINAHL, Embase, and Medline.
- Characterized 64 eligible studies (19 randomized, 45 non-randomized) by design, outcomes, and intervention focus, managing data with DistillerSR and Covidence.
Main Results:
- Shared decision-making (SDM) and initial LCS uptake were the most frequently studied intervention areas.
- Educational interventions, often one-on-one, dominated the reviewed studies (n=33).
- Studies showed statistically significant improvements in patient knowledge and decision-making aspects, but findings on LCS uptake were variable.
Conclusions:
- Current LCS intervention strategies primarily address SDM and initial uptake, with limited focus on risk/eligibility assessment and adherence to annual screening or diagnostic testing.
- There is a need to expand intervention strategies beyond education-focused, single-level approaches.
- Developing multilevel interventions is crucial for enhancing the evidence base and supporting high-quality LCS implementation in practice.
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Preventive Healthcare Services
Cancer Survival Analysis
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...

