Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2025

Assessment of the Metabolic Effects of Isocaloric 2:1 Intermittent Fasting in Mice
Published on: November 27, 2019
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Time-Restricted Eating With and Without
Danielle Fernandes-Alves1, Gabriela Pereira Teixeira1, Kisian Costa Guimarães1
1Chrononutrition Research Group (Cronutri), School of Medicine, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais 38405-320, Brazil.
Context:
Although it is well established that caloric restriction (CR) is the primary driver of weight loss, circadian-driven metabolic benefits have been recognized as possibly enhancing the effects of CR. Time-restricted eating (TRE) has emerged as a promising approach in this context.
Objective:
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of TRE with isocaloric diet controls (analysis 1) and non-isocaloric controls (analysis 2) on anthropometric and body-composition parameters in adults with overweight or obesity.
Data Sources:
A search was carried out in the Medline, LILACS, Embase, and CENTRAL databases using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and similar terms such as "Obesity," "Obesity, Abdominal," "Time-restricted eating," "Body weight," "Changes in body weight," and others.
Data Extraction:
We included 30 studies involving a total of 1341 participants. Studies were screened based on titles and abstracts followed by full-text reading, and data were extracted from eligible studies using a pre-established form. All these steps were performed by 2 authors independently and blinded, with discrepancies resolved by a third author.
Data Analysis:
The results of main findings revealed that, in studies using non-isocaloric controls, the TRE group showed significant reductions in body weight (BW) (mean difference [MD]: -2.82 kg; 95% CI: -3.49, -2.15), fat mass (FM) (MD: -1.36 kg; 95% CI: -2.09, -0.63), and fat-free mass (FFM) (MD: -0.86 kg; 95% CI: -1.23, -0.49). In studies that used isocaloric control strategies, the TRE group showed significant reductions in BW (MD: -1.46 kg; 95% CI: -2.65, -0.26), FM (MD: -1.50 kg; 95% CI: -2.77, -0.24), and FFM (MD: -0.41 kg; 95% CI: -0.79, -0. 03).
Conclusion:
TRE yields favorable anthropometric and clinical outcomes, even when intake is isocaloric between the intervention and control groups. This result suggests that circadian effects may enhance the impact of CR on excess weight.
Systematic Review Registration:
PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022301594.
Related Concept Videos
Hormonal Regulation
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

