Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Comparative Analysis of Screw Loosening between SynOcta and InOcta Tissue Level Abutments: An In Vitro Study.
Amirhossein Fathi1, Erfan Esmaeilian1, Sepideh Salehi2
1Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Dental implants can loosen, but this study found InOcta abutments offer superior screw stability over SynOcta abutments. This research highlights InOcta
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Biomaterials Science
- Mechanical Engineering
Background:
- Dental implant screw loosening is a common complication.
- Abutment type and collar height influence screw stability.
- Comparing InOcta and SynOcta abutments is crucial for improving implant longevity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the screw loosening torque between InOcta and SynOcta abutments.
- To evaluate the mechanical stability of different abutment types under simulated chewing forces.
- To identify factors contributing to dental implant screw stability.
Main Methods:
- Laboratory study involving 20 titanium dental implants (Dentis brand).
- InOcta and SynOcta abutments were installed and torqued to 30 N·cm.
- Samples underwent 10,000 cycles of 90 N compressive force in a chewing simulator.
- Loosening torque was measured and analyzed using an independent t-test.
Main Results:
- The mean de-torque for InOcta abutments was 25.75 N·cm.
- The mean de-torque for SynOcta abutments was 21.98 N·cm.
- InOcta abutments showed significantly higher screw stability (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- InOcta abutments demonstrate significantly greater resistance to screw loosening compared to SynOcta abutments.
- These findings suggest InOcta abutments may offer improved long-term stability for dental implants.
- Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm these laboratory findings.
More Related Videos
09:07An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
Published on: May 31, 2017
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Polarity of the Cytoskeleton
Studying the Cytoskeleton
Fibrous Proteins
Insensitive Nuclei Enhanced by Polarization Transfer (INEPT)
Classification and Mechanical Properties of Synthetic Polymers