Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
Defining and Characterizing Inappropriate Goals of Care Designation: A 10-year Retrospective Multicenter ICU Cohort
Selena Au1, Paloma Perepeluk2, Andrea Soo1
1Department of Critical Care Medicine (S.A., A.S., J.S.), Alberta Health Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Inappropriate Goals of Care Designation (GCD) affects 5.7% of ICU deaths, often due to poor communication and documentation. Improving these areas can reduce inappropriate care and enhance patient-centered decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Critical Care Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Goals of Care Designation (GCD) guides interventions during acute clinical deterioration.
- Inappropriate GCD arises from communication failures regarding patient wishes, values, documentation, or agreement on medical effectiveness.
- The prevalence and causes of inappropriate GCD in ICUs were previously unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the frequency and contributing factors of inappropriate Goals of Care Designation (GCD) in intensive care units (ICUs).
- To identify associated stakeholder and contextual features of patients with inappropriate GCD.
- To establish a baseline incidence for future quality improvement initiatives.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective multicenter cohort study of adult patients who died in the ICU from 2010-2019.
- Utilized an existing quality assurance database and physician reviewer flagging for goals of care concerns.
- Analyzed 4656 patient cases, with 265 meeting criteria for inappropriate GCD.
Main Results:
- 5.7% (265/4656) of ICU deaths involved inappropriate GCD.
- Suboptimal communication (44.9%), documentation (29.1%), and stakeholder agreement (43.4%) were key factors.
- More intensive resuscitation orders occurred in 21.5% of cases, often during crisis communication or pre-procedure.
Conclusions:
- A validated definition of inappropriate GCD provides a baseline incidence for quality improvement.
- Systemic improvements in communication, documentation, and decision-making processes can reduce inappropriate care.
- This study highlights opportunities to optimize patient care and align it with patient values.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Standards of Care I
Standards of Care II
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Ethical Dilemmas II
Planning Nursing Care I

