Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2025

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Published on: January 17, 2025
A controlled trial examining large Language model conformity in psychiatric assessment using the Asch paradigm
Dorit Hadar Shoval1,2, Karny Gigi3, Yuval Haber3,4
1The Center for Psychobiological Research, Department of Psychology and Educational Counseling, Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley, Israel. dorith@yvc.ac.il.
Large language models (LLMs) show conformity under social pressure, failing psychiatric assessments with increasing diagnostic uncertainty. This highlights the need to address social dynamics for AI integration in mental healthcare.
Area of Science:
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Computational Psychiatry
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Large language models (LLMs) show promise in medical diagnostics but face integration challenges in psychiatry.
- The impact of social pressure on LLM performance in clinical settings is not well understood.
- Investigating LLM conformity behavior is crucial for their safe deployment in mental health.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine if large language models (LLMs) exhibit conformity behavior under social pressure.
- To assess how diagnostic uncertainty influences LLM performance in simulated clinical tasks.
- To specifically evaluate LLM responses in psychiatric assessment scenarios.
Main Methods:
- An adapted Asch paradigm was used to test GPT-4o performance across three domains of diagnostic uncertainty.
- Three pressure conditions were applied: no pressure, full pressure, and partial pressure from simulated peer responses.
- Performance was evaluated using a 3x3 factorial design with 90 total observations, analyzed via binomial and chi-square tests.
Main Results:
- GPT-4o achieved 100% accuracy without pressure but accuracy declined significantly under social pressure.
- Performance degradation intensified with diagnostic uncertainty: 50% (circle recognition), 40% (tumor identification), and 0% (psychiatric assessment) under full pressure.
- Psychiatric assessment showed complete failure (0% accuracy) under both full and partial pressure conditions, with statistically significant differences.
Conclusions:
- LLMs demonstrate significant conformity behavior that exacerbates with diagnostic uncertainty, leading to complete failure in complex tasks like psychiatric assessment.
- Implementing AI in psychiatry necessitates careful consideration of social influences and diagnostic ambiguity.
- Future research should explore AI independence strategies and validate findings across diverse AI systems and clinical tools.
Related Concept Videos
Conformity
Obedience
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority

