Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2025

05:59
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
6.7K
Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form Among Individuals With Visual Impairments
Ginny M Frederick1, E Grace Threadgill1, Sami Yli-Piipari1
1University of Georgia.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
|May 13, 2025
Summary
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) shows moderate agreement with accelerometer data for physical activity in individuals with visual impairments, but caution is advised for its use in this population.
Area of Science:
- Kinesiology
- Public Health
- Ophthalmology
Background:
- Accurate assessment of physical activity is crucial for public health, especially in populations with visual impairments (VI).
- The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) is a common self-report tool, but its validity in individuals with VI is not well-established.
- Understanding the nuances of IPAQ-SF validity across different levels of vision loss (no usable vision [NUV] vs. some usable vision [SUV]) is important.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the concurrent validity of the IPAQ-SF against accelerometer data in adults with visual impairments.
- To compare the IPAQ-SF's validity between individuals with NUV and SUV.
- To assess validity using different accelerometer cut-points (Freedson and Troiano).
Main Methods:
- Eighty adults with VI (mean age 47.7 years, 62.5% female) participated.
- Participants wore accelerometers for seven days and completed the IPAQ-SF.
- Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests, Friedman tests, and chi-square tests, with participants grouped by NUV or SUV.
Main Results:
- Moderate agreement was found between IPAQ-SF and accelerometer data for moderate and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (ρ = 0.49-0.50).
- Agreement was slightly stronger in the NUV group compared to the SUV group.
- Agreement for sedentary behavior was negligible, and self-reported MVPA showed weak agreement with accelerometer data in both VI subgroups.
Conclusions:
- The IPAQ-SF demonstrates moderate concurrent validity for assessing physical activity in individuals with visual impairments, though with high error rates.
- Validity may differ slightly between those with no usable vision and those with some usable vision.
- Researchers should exercise caution when utilizing the IPAQ-SF to measure physical activity levels in the visually impaired population.

