Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Leveraging American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification and Surgeon Risk Estimates to
Margaret T Berrigan1, Brendin R Beaulieu-Jones2, Jayson S Marwaha2
1Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Combining the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA PS class) with surgeon risk estimates improves postsurgical complication prediction. This combined approach offers accuracy comparable to traditional clinical data models for better patient risk stratification.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
- Surgical Risk Assessment
- Health Services Research
Background:
- The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA PS class) is a standard pre-surgical risk assessment tool.
- However, the ASA PS class does not incorporate surgery-specific factors or intraoperative events, limiting its predictive accuracy for postoperative complications.
- There is a need for enhanced postsurgical risk stratification tools that integrate multiple predictive elements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a postsurgical risk stratification tool by combining the ASA PS class with surgeon-generated risk estimates.
- To assess the accuracy of this combined tool in predicting 30-day postoperative morbidity.
- To compare the performance of the combined tool against traditional clinical data-based models.
Main Methods:
- Surgeons at an academic center provided pre-operative risk estimates for their patients.
- Data on ASA PS class, pre-surgical clinical features, and post-surgical outcomes were collected from institutional databases and electronic health records.
- Binomial regression models were used to predict 30-day morbidity, comparing models using clinical features, ASA PS class, surgeon risk estimates, and combinations thereof.
Main Results:
- The study included 286 patients across 68 procedure types, with 61.89% having ASA PS class 3 or higher.
- The overall complication rate was 27.27%.
- Combining ASA PS class and surgeon risk estimates achieved a model discrimination (AUC 0.84) comparable to a clinical data-based model (AUC 0.84) and superior to either assessment alone (ASA PS AUC 0.79; surgeon estimate AUC 0.71).
Conclusions:
- Both ASA PS class and surgeon risk estimates are independently predictive of 30-day morbidity.
- The combination of ASA PS class and surgeon risk estimates significantly improves the prediction of postsurgical complications.
- Judgment-derived assessments, when combined with standardized tools like ASA PS class, offer a powerful and accurate method for postsurgical risk stratification.
Related Concept Videos
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Stages of General Anesthesia

