Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a technology-enhanced psychiatric collaborative care model among rural
Ryan Kruis1,2, Emily Johnson3, Constance Guille4
1Manatt Health Strategies, Chicago, IL, USA. rkruis@manatt.com.
Background:
Psychiatric collaborative care management (CoCM) has potential to mitigate the challenges rural communities face accessing behavioral health (BH) services. However, implementation of CoCM in rural clinics has proved difficult and may benefit from a tailored approach. This study examines implementation of a telehealth-enabled CoCM program in four rural South Carolina clinics guided by the Dynamic Adaptation Process (DAP), with particular focus on identifying barriers, facilitators, and strategies to support implementation.
Methods:
This study used a mixed-methods, embedded, chronological case study approach, integrating several data sources collected longitudinally during implementation. Data included surveys, focus groups, key informant interviews, and administrative data. Data were integrated using a weaving approach to develop summaries of each of the DAP phases of program implementation (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment).
Results:
Initial Exploration implementation activities included workflow development, telehealth platform configuration, building the CoCM provider team, and conducting an assessment among implementation clinics. Scarcity of BH resources was the primary barrier to rural BH treatment, leading to strong anticipated fit of the CoCM pilot among providers. These data informed activities and adaptations in subsequent phases. During the Preparation phase, the CoCM team was trained and site visits were conducted by the remote care manager to build rapport with clinic staff. In Implementation, the pilot launched, receiving 296 referrals and 99 patient enrollments in the first eight months. Post-implementation feedback showed strong provider satisfaction. Patient need, patient interest, and provider engagement with the care manager were identified as the primary facilitators for referral. During the Sustainment phase, workflow, technology, and auditing process improvements took place alongside planning for future program expansion.
Conclusionl:
The DAP shows great utility for tailoring implementation of CoCM to specific rural settings by providing a roadmap for identifying contextual barriers and facilitators that can be addressed through adaptation and other implementation strategies.
More Related Videos
09:55Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
08:13Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
Published on: January 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Current Trends in Nursing II
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...