Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

07:50
Measuring Local Tissue Strains in Tendons via Open-Source Digital Image Correlation
Published on: January 27, 2023
2.2K
Vendor-agnostic 3D multiparametric relaxometry improves cross-platform reproducibility.
Shohei Fujita1,2,3,4, Borjan Gagoski2,5, Jon-Fredrik Nielsen6
1Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|May 27, 2025
Summary
Implementing the 3D-QALAS technique with the Pulseq platform improves T1 and T2 mapping reproducibility across MRI scanners and vendors. This open-source approach harmonizes multiparametric relaxometry data for consistent results.
Area of Science:
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Medical Physics
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Multiparametric relaxometry provides valuable tissue characteristics.
- Current MRI techniques face challenges in data harmonization across different scanners and vendors.
- There is a need for a standardized, cross-platform approach to relaxometry.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and evaluate a simultaneous T1 and T2 mapping technique (3D-QALAS) using the open-source Pulseq platform.
- To assess the cross-platform, multiparametric relaxometry technique's performance across different vendors and sites.
- To address the unmet need for data harmonization in MRI relaxometry.
Main Methods:
- Implemented 3D-QALAS using the vendor-agnostic Pulseq platform for simultaneous T1 and T2 mapping.
- Tested the technique on four 3T scanners from two vendors across two sites.
- Evaluated cross-scanner, cross-software version, cross-site, and cross-vendor variability using a phantom and human subjects.
Main Results:
- Pulseq-QALAS showed high linearity and correlation with reference values in a phantom (R² > 0.99).
- The Pulseq implementation significantly improved phantom T2 reproducibility (CV, 2.3% vs. 17%) compared to vendor-native sequences.
- Reduced cross-vendor variability in vivo, particularly for gray matter T2 values (CV, 2.3% vs. 5.9%).
Conclusions:
- An identical implementation of relaxometry techniques across platforms enhances measurement reproducibility.
- The Pulseq-based 3D-QALAS technique facilitates data harmonization for multiparametric MRI.
- Standardized approaches are crucial for reliable and comparable relaxometry data acquisition.
Keywords:
cross‐vendor techniquedata poolingmultiparametric mappingquantitative magnetic resonance imagingrelaxation timerelaxometry
