Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
Hemodynamics in aortic dissections: A fluid-solid interaction study in an idealized dissection model with a false
Amith Balasubramanya1, Lise Gheysen1, Markus U Wagenhäuser2
1Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Belgium.
Side-branches (SBs) in Type-B aortic dissection (TBAD) increase pressures in the true lumen (TL) and false lumen (FL). SBs in the FL reduce FL ejection fraction and dissected membrane motion, impacting TBAD hemodynamics.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Mechanics
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging and Simulation
Background:
- Side-branches (SBs) from the false lumen (FL) in Type-B aortic dissection (TBAD) affect FL patency and growth.
- Understanding FL hemodynamics is critical for TBAD management.
- Fluid-solid interaction (FSI) simulations offer insights into complex aortic dissection mechanics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare FL hemodynamics under different SB configurations in TBAD using FSI simulation.
- To quantify the impact of SB presence and location on TL and FL pressures, flow, and membrane displacement.
- To elucidate the role of SBs in TBAD pathophysiology.
Main Methods:
- A strongly coupled Fluid-Solid Interaction (FSI) simulation was employed.
- Four scenarios were simulated: no SB (NSB), SB in FL (SB_FL), SB in FL with no re-entry tear (SB_FL_1T), and SB in TL (SB_TL).
- Pulsatile mass flow inlet and Windkessel models at outlets ensured consistent total vascular resistance.
Main Results:
- SB presence increased systolic pressures in both TL and FL, with the highest increase observed for SB_FL.
- SBs in the FL reduced FL ejection fraction (FLEF) and increased cycle-averaged transmembrane pressure (TMP¯).
- NSB showed the largest dissected membrane displacement, while SB_FL exhibited the smallest.
Conclusions:
- SBs significantly alter TBAD hemodynamics beyond flow velocity changes, increasing TL and FL pressures.
- SBs, particularly those in the FL, influence FL function and aortic wall motion.
- While findings are based on idealized geometry, they highlight the hemodynamic importance of SBs in TBAD.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care

