Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

450
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
450
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

391
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
391
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity01:24

Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity

343
A stroke engine has a slider-crank mechanism that converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider.
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
343
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration01:22

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration

327
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame. The absolute velocity of point B is determined by adding the absolute velocity of point A, the relative velocity of point B in the rotating frame, and the effects caused by the angular velocity within the rotating frame.
Time differentiation is...
327
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

218
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
218
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

341
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
341

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The ASPIRE Research Institute Dataset: Building a Foundation for Brain Health Research in the United Arab Emirates.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Responses of neurons in macaque V4 to object and texture images.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Multimodal MRI reveals consistent basal ganglia and limbic system alterations in COVID-19 survivors.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

A case study of sudden-onset cortically mediated visual impairments in a 12-year-old.

Research square·2025
Same author

Modulating food craving-related neural oscillations using tACS: study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled trial.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2025
Same author

Gray matter abnormalities in sight deprivation and sight restoration.

Brain structure & function·2025
Same journal

Poisoning the Genome: Targeted Backdoor Attacks on DNA Foundation Models.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Mechanistic mathematical model of the in vitro infection dynamics of Bunyamwera and Batai viruses including MOI-dependent shortening of the eclipse phase.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

AI-Driven Lumped-Element Modeling of Human Respiratory System for Studying Voice Mechanics.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Beyond Algorithms: Conceptual Innovation in Medical Imaging AI.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Feynman Kac Reweighted Schrödinger Bridge Matching for Surface-Based Tau PET Harmonization.

ArXiv·2026
Same journal

Agentic Discovery of Non-Canonical Antimicrobial Peptides with AMPGAN v3.

ArXiv·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Confocal Imaging of Confined Quiescent and Flowing Colloid-polymer Mixtures
10:56

Confocal Imaging of Confined Quiescent and Flowing Colloid-polymer Mixtures

Published on: May 20, 2014

12.1K

Detection of moving objects using self-motion constraints on optic flow.

Hope Lutwak1, Bas Rokers2, Eero P Simoncelli3

  • 1Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY USA.

Arxiv
|June 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans detect moving objects by identifying retinal velocity deviations from self-motion constraints. This visual perception relies on how object motion breaks predictable patterns caused by our own movement through space.

Keywords:
ego-motionlocal motionmoving object detectionoptic flowvirtual reality

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

547
Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging
07:12

Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging

Published on: January 24, 2025

649

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Confocal Imaging of Confined Quiescent and Flowing Colloid-polymer Mixtures
10:56

Confocal Imaging of Confined Quiescent and Flowing Colloid-polymer Mixtures

Published on: May 20, 2014

12.1K
Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

547
Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging
07:12

Profiling Maternal Behavior Responses During Whole-Brain Imaging

Published on: January 24, 2025

649

Area of Science:

  • Vision Science
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Perception

Background:

  • The human visual system must distinguish self-motion from object motion amidst complex, dynamic visual input.
  • Retinal velocity patterns are constrained by the geometry of self-motion through a 3D environment.
  • Deviations from these self-motion-induced velocity constraints may signal object movement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether humans use self-motion velocity constraints to detect moving objects.
  • To determine if deviations from predicted retinal velocity patterns are key to motion detection.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized virtual reality to simulate forward self-motion in diverse environments with varying depth information precision.
  • Presented wide-field visual stimuli to participants.
  • Participants identified if a cued object moved relative to the simulated environment.

Main Results:

  • Object detection performance correlated with the deviation of the object's retinal velocity from the self-motion constraint line.
  • Performance was not dependent on the difference between the object's retinal velocity and its immediate surround.
  • The precision of depth information influenced the endpoints of the velocity constraint segments.

Conclusions:

  • Human motion detection effectively leverages the geometric constraints imposed by self-motion.
  • Deviations from expected retinal velocity patterns, rather than local velocity differences, are crucial for distinguishing object motion.
  • Depth perception accuracy modulates the visual system's interpretation of self-motion velocity constraints.