Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Strategies for validation.

R A Lew

    National Cancer Institute Monograph
    |May 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Clinical researchers face challenges interpreting complex multivariate analyses. This study proposes validation calculations to simplify understanding predictive models for medical outcomes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Trends in usage of the terms keratinocyte carcinoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer in the medical literature.

    The British journal of dermatology·2019
    Same author

    Early death from clinical stage I melanoma.

    The Journal of investigative dermatology·2010
    Same author

    Factors associated with death from melanoma from 2 to 5 years following diagnosis in clinical stage I patients.

    The Journal of investigative dermatology·2010
    Same author

    Acute kidney injury in the rat causes cardiac remodelling and increases angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 expression.

    Experimental physiology·2008
    Same author

    Developmental expression of ACE2 in the SHR kidney: a role in hypertension?

    Kidney international·2006
    Same author

    Lateralized cognitive dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

    Lupus·2005
    Same journal

    Forty-five years of cancer incidence in Connecticut: 1935-79.

    National Cancer Institute monograph·1986
    Same journal

    Second cancer following cancer of the breast in Connecticut, 1935-82.

    National Cancer Institute monograph·1985
    Same journal

    Second cancer following cancer of the respiratory system in Connecticut, 1935-1982.

    National Cancer Institute monograph·1985
    Same journal

    Second cancer following cancer of the digestive system in Connecticut, 1935-82.

    National Cancer Institute monograph·1985
    Same journal

    Summary: multiple primary cancers in Denmark, 1943-80.

    National Cancer Institute monograph·1985
    Same journal

    Second cancer following lymphatic and hematopoietic cancers in Denmark, 1943-80.

    National Cancer Institute monograph·1985
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Clinical Research Methodology
    • Medical Informatics

    Background:

    • Multivariate statistical analyses are crucial for identifying predictors of medical outcomes.
    • Interpreting complex multivariate results presents a significant challenge for clinical researchers.
    • Existing statistical packages often provide intricate analyses without sufficient validation tools.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a method for enhancing statistical packages to aid clinical researchers.
    • To simplify the interpretation of complex multivariate analyses in clinical research.
    • To provide validation calculations for primary multivariate analyses.

    Main Methods:

    • Developing supplementary calculations for statistical packages upon request.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Generating simple tabulations to illustrate relationships between factors and outcomes.
  • Performing alternative analyses to identify consistent and variable predictors.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method provides clear tabulations of factor-outcome relationships.
    • Alternative analyses highlight factors consistently selected across models.
    • The approach identifies factors unique to the primary analysis and those that are substitutable.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed validation calculations enhance the interpretability of multivariate analyses for clinicians.
    • This approach facilitates a better understanding of predictive models in clinical research.
    • Statistical software can be improved to better support clinical decision-making through simplified validation.