Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2025

13:04
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
12.2K
On the Robustness and Provenance of the Gambler's Fallacy
Yang Xiang1, Kevin Dorst2, Samuel J Gershman1,3,4
1Department of Psychology, Harvard University.
Psychological Science
|June 5, 2025
Summary
The gambler's fallacy, a belief in streaks influencing random events, was tested using probabilistic predictions. This study found that probabilistic predictions, unlike point predictions, did not exhibit the gambler's fallacy.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Decision Science
Background:
- The gambler's fallacy is the misconception that past independent events influence future random outcomes.
- Previous research often used non-independent sequences or point predictions, limiting understanding of probabilistic reasoning.
- Existing theories suggest the fallacy stems from flawed probabilistic reasoning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the gambler's fallacy using truly independent sequences and probabilistic predictions.
- To differentiate between the influence of probabilistic reasoning versus decision-making stages on the fallacy.
Main Methods:
- Conducted high-powered, preregistered studies with 750 adult participants from Amazon Mechanical Turk.
- Participants provided probabilistic predictions for independent random event sequences.
- Compared results from probabilistic predictions against point predictions.
Main Results:
- Probabilistic predictions did not elicit the gambler's fallacy.
- Point predictions demonstrated a significant gambler's fallacy.
- Point predictions could not be accurately reconstructed from probability judgments.
Conclusions:
- The gambler's fallacy appears to originate in the decision-making stage, not probabilistic reasoning.
- Findings challenge existing theories attributing the fallacy solely to flawed probabilistic judgment.
- New theoretical frameworks are needed to explain the decision-stage origin of the gambler's fallacy.
Related Concept Videos
Bias
5.6K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
5.6K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
3.5K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.5K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.3K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.3K
Hindsight Biases
3.9K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.9K
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
7
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
7
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
1.1K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.1K

