Related Experiment Videos
Common statistical errors in systematic reviews: A tutorial
Afroditi Kanellopoulou1,2, Kerry Dwan3, Rachel Richardson1
1Methods Support Unit, Evidence Production and Methods Directorate Cochrane London UK.
Abstract:
The aim of this article is to present the most common statistical errors in meta-analyses included in systematic reviews; these are confusing standard deviation and standard error, using heterogeneity estimators for choosing between a common-effect and random-effects model, improper handling of multiarm trials, and unnecessary and misinterpreted subgroup analyses. We introduce some useful terminology and explain what authors can do to avoid these errors and how peer reviewers can spot them. We have also developed a micro-learning module to provide practical hands-on tutorial.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Random Error
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...