Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Polymer Classification: Architecture01:14

Polymer Classification: Architecture

3.0K
Polymers are classified as linear or branched on the basis of their chain architecture. The polymer chains in linear polymers have a long chain-like structure with minimal to no branching at all. Even if a polymer features large substituent groups on the monomer, which appear as branches to the skeleton, it is not considered a branched polymer. A branched polymer contains secondary polymer chains that arise from the main polymer chain. The branching occurs when the polymer growth shifts from...
3.0K
Polymers: Molecular Weight Distribution01:10

Polymers: Molecular Weight Distribution

3.8K
For any given polymer, the weight average molecular weight (Mw) is higher than, if not equal to, the number average molecular weight (Mn). The only situation in which the weight average molecular weight and the number average molecular weight are equal is when a polymer consists only of chains with equal molecular weight. However, this never happens in a synthetic polymer, since it is difficult to control the polymerization process up to a molecular level with accuracy to a hundred percent.
3.8K
Molecular Weight of Step-Growth Polymers01:08

Molecular Weight of Step-Growth Polymers

2.3K
Step growth polymerization involves bi or multifunctional monomers. Bifunctional monomers react to form linear step growth polymers, whereas multifunctional monomers react to form non-linear or branched polymers.
As the step-growth polymerization involves step-wise condensation of monomers, the molecular weight also builds up eventually. Consequently, high molecular weight polymers are obtained at the late stages of the polymerization, where 99% of monomers have been consumed.
The extent of the...
2.3K
Step-Growth Polymerization: Overview01:03

Step-Growth Polymerization: Overview

3.6K
Step-growth or condensation polymerization is a stepwise reaction of bi or multifunctional monomers to form long-chain polymers. As all the monomers are reactive, most of the monomers are consumed at the early stages of the reaction to form small chains of reactive oligomers, which then combine to form long polymer chains in the late stages. Hence, the reaction has to proceed for a long time to achieve high molecular weight polymers.
Many natural and synthetic polymers are produced by...
3.6K
Types of Step-Growth Polymers: Polyesters01:20

Types of Step-Growth Polymers: Polyesters

2.3K
The introduction of polyesters has brought major development to the textile industry. The wrinkle-free behavior of polyester blends has eliminated the need for starching and ironing clothes.
Polyesters are commonly prepared from terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol; the crude product is known as poly(ethylene terephthalate) or PET. However, polyesters are synthesized industrially by transesterification of dimethyl terephthalate with ethylene glycol at 150 °C. The two reactants and the...
2.3K
Polymer Classification: Crystallinity01:21

Polymer Classification: Crystallinity

3.1K
Unlike ionic or small covalent molecules, polymers do not form crystalline solids due to the diffusion limitations of their long-chain structures. However, polymers contain microscopic crystalline domains separated by amorphous domains.
Crystalline domains are the regions where polymer chains are aligned in an orderly manner and held together in proximity by intermolecular forces. For example, chains in the crystalline domains of polyethylene and nylon are bound together by van der Waals...
3.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spin Dewetting of Ultrathin Polymer Films.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2026
Same author

Design of Multifunctional Bioactive Peptides for Potential Application in Food Packaging: A Machine-Learning-Integrated Optimization Framework.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

<i>In Vivo</i> Drug-Eluting Smart Scaffold for Diabetic Wounds.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

Influence of Substrate Surface Energy and Thickness on the Evaporation Dynamics of Sessile Saline Droplets.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2025
Same author

Fibroblast Morphology, Adhesion, and Proliferation over Bio Mimetically Patterned Surfaces.

ACS biomaterials science & engineering·2025
Same author

Synergistic influence of substrate wettability and topography on surface phase separation in PS/PMMA blend thin films.

Soft matter·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Self-assembling Morphologies Obtained from Helical Polycarbodiimide Copolymers and Their Triazole Derivatives
09:22

Self-assembling Morphologies Obtained from Helical Polycarbodiimide Copolymers and Their Triazole Derivatives

Published on: February 7, 2017

7.9K

Morphology prediction for polymer blend thin films using machine learning.

Bishnu R1, Rabibrata Mukherjee2, Nandini Bhandaru1

  • 1Chemical Engineering Department, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS) Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, Jawahar Nagar, Medchal District, Hyderabad-500078, Telangana, India. nandini@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in.

Soft Matter
|June 9, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a machine learning model to predict polymer blend thin film morphology. The support vector machine (SVM) model accurately forecasts morphology, aiding experimental design for specific applications.

More Related Videos

Fabrication of Large-area Free-standing Ultrathin Polymer Films
10:08

Fabrication of Large-area Free-standing Ultrathin Polymer Films

Published on: June 3, 2015

15.5K
Fabricating Reactive Surfaces with Brush-like and Crosslinked Films of Azlactone-Functionalized Block Co-Polymers
10:09

Fabricating Reactive Surfaces with Brush-like and Crosslinked Films of Azlactone-Functionalized Block Co-Polymers

Published on: June 30, 2018

8.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 19, 2025

Self-assembling Morphologies Obtained from Helical Polycarbodiimide Copolymers and Their Triazole Derivatives
09:22

Self-assembling Morphologies Obtained from Helical Polycarbodiimide Copolymers and Their Triazole Derivatives

Published on: February 7, 2017

7.9K
Fabrication of Large-area Free-standing Ultrathin Polymer Films
10:08

Fabrication of Large-area Free-standing Ultrathin Polymer Films

Published on: June 3, 2015

15.5K
Fabricating Reactive Surfaces with Brush-like and Crosslinked Films of Azlactone-Functionalized Block Co-Polymers
10:09

Fabricating Reactive Surfaces with Brush-like and Crosslinked Films of Azlactone-Functionalized Block Co-Polymers

Published on: June 30, 2018

8.4K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Polymer Science
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Polymer blend thin films exhibit mesoscale morphologies dependent on processing parameters.
  • Morphology is critical for determining thin film applications.
  • Understanding phase separation in immiscible polymer blends is essential for materials design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a machine learning (ML) framework for predicting the morphology of polystyrene/polymethyl methacrylate (PS/PMMA) blend thin films.
  • To guide experimentalists in designing thin films with desired morphologies.
  • To enhance the understanding of phase separation phenomena in polymer blends.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized experimental parameters (PS weight fraction, PMMA molecular weight, concentration, substrate surface energy) as inputs for ML models.
  • Employed multi-class classification to predict morphology types (column, hole, island).
  • Implemented Support Vector Machine (SVM) and other ML algorithms, alongside explainable AI techniques.

Main Results:

  • Achieved a highest prediction accuracy of 93.75% using the SVM algorithm.
  • Explainable ML provided insights consistent with experimental observations, validating the model.
  • Identified key parameters influencing phase separation and morphology formation.

Conclusions:

  • The ML framework reliably predicts PS/PMMA blend thin film morphology.
  • Insights from explainable AI deepen the understanding of polymer phase separation.
  • Developed guidelines and a web tool to facilitate experimental design for specific thin film morphologies.