Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2025

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Published on: August 6, 2019
Intraoperative Radiation Exposure with Percutaneous vs Hybrid Hallux Valgus Correction: A Comparative Study.
Lorena Bejarano-Pineda1, Lercan Aslan1,2, Julien Beldame3
1Foot & Ankle Research and Innovation Lab (FARIL), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus (HV) using percutaneous techniques shows higher radiation exposure than hybrid methods. However, radiation doses for patients and surgical teams remain within safe limits, supporting percutaneous HV correction use.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Radiological Safety
- Minimally Invasive Techniques
Background:
- Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for hallux valgus (HV) is increasingly popular but raises concerns regarding fluoroscopy use and radiation exposure.
- Traditional open techniques for HV correction are being compared with newer MIS approaches.
- This study specifically addresses radiation exposure differences between percutaneous HV correction and a hybrid technique.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare intraoperative radiation exposure between percutaneous HV correction and a hybrid technique using a mini C-arm.
- To evaluate dose-area product (DAP) and exposure duration for both surgical methods.
- To assess the cumulative radiation doses for patients and surgical teams against established safety thresholds.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving 68 patients undergoing HV correction from February 2022 to July 2023.
- Group 1: 37 patients (percutaneous chevron and Akin osteotomy).
- Group 2: 31 patients (hybrid technique: mini-open distal chevron osteotomy + percutaneous Akin osteotomy).
- Radiation exposure measured via DAP, exposure duration, and dosimeters for personnel and patients.
Main Results:
- Group 1 (percutaneous) showed significantly higher mean DAP (3.02 cGy/cm²) and exposure duration (56.74 seconds) compared to Group 2 (hybrid) (1.56 cGy/cm², 23.54 seconds).
- Despite increased use per case, cumulative radiation doses for both patients and surgical teams remained below International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) safety limits.
- ICRP limits are 5 cGy for whole body/eye lens and 50 cGy for hand exposure.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous hallux valgus correction involves greater intraoperative fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure.
- Radiation exposure remains within ICRP safety limits when using mini C-arm fluoroscopy.
- Percutaneous techniques are supported for use in appropriately selected hallux valgus patients.
More Related Videos
15:04An Anatomical Study of Nerves at Risk During Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Surgery
Published on: February 17, 2018
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023