Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

09:17
Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding
Published on: March 28, 2025
1.2K
Optimization of ergonomic parameters in overhead arc welding using grey relational analysis
Md Dilshad Alam1, Imtiaz Ali Khan1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Journal of Biomechanics
|June 20, 2025
Summary
Optimizing shoulder, elbow, and wrist positions in overhead arc welding reduces discomfort and pain. This ergonomic approach enhances worker comfort and task efficiency, minimizing work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
Area of Science:
- Ergonomics and Occupational Health
- Industrial Engineering
- Welding Technology
Background:
- Overhead arc welding poses significant physical demands, leading to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs).
- Sustained awkward postures, repetitive motions, and inadequate workstations contribute to upper limb and lower back issues.
- These factors negatively impact worker performance, health, safety, and comfort.
Purpose of the Study:
- To optimize shoulder angle, elbow angle, and wrist position for overhead arc welding tasks.
- To minimize worker discomfort, shoulder pain, grip force, and task duration.
- To enhance overall worker well-being and productivity in demanding welding environments.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an L27 orthogonal array design to systematically evaluate ergonomic factors.
- Employed Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) to determine optimal factor combinations.
- Applied Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to assess the significance of input factors and TOPSIS for validation.
Main Results:
- Identified optimal configuration: shoulder angle (115-125°), elbow angle (30-40°), and neutral wrist position (A2B3C2).
- ANOVA confirmed significant influence of shoulder angle, elbow angle, and wrist position on grip force, task efficiency, shoulder pain, and discomfort.
- Experimental validation confirmed the effectiveness of the identified optimal ergonomic settings.
Conclusions:
- Ergonomic optimization of joint angles and wrist posture is crucial for mitigating WMSDs in overhead arc welding.
- Findings provide practical insights for improving workstation design and task execution to enhance welder comfort and productivity.
- Further research is recommended to explore broader participant demographics, EMG analysis, and dynamic movement consistency.
Keywords:
AnthropometryDiscomfort ratingGrey Relational Analysis (GRA)Grip forceOverhead arc weldingWMSDs, ANOVAMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Machines: Problem Solving II
377
Machines are complex structures consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that work together to transmit forces. Consider a lifting tong carrying a 100 kg load. It comprises movable sections DAF and CBG linked together with member AB.
377
Internal Loadings in Structural Members: Problem Solving
1.4K
When designing or analyzing a structural member, it is important to consider the internal loadings developed within the member. These internal loadings include normal force, shear force, and bending moment. Engineers can ensure that the structural member can support the applied external forces by calculating these internal loadings.
To illustrate this, let's consider a beam OC of 5 kN, inclined at an angle of 53.13° with the horizontal and supported at both ends. Determine the internal...
To illustrate this, let's consider a beam OC of 5 kN, inclined at an angle of 53.13° with the horizontal and supported at both ends. Determine the internal...
1.4K
Method of Joints: Problem Solving II
690
Consider a truss structure with frictionless joints fixed to a wall and roller support. If a force of 150 N is applied to joint A, the forces in each member of the truss can be determined using the method of joints.
690
Frames: Problem Solving I
606
Consider a jib crane with an external load suspended from the pulley. The dimensions of the crane members are shown in the figure. A systematic analysis of the frame structure is required to determine the reaction forces at the pin joints, assuming that the pulleys are frictionless.
606
Applications of Stress
409
Consider a structure made of a boom and a rod designed to support a load. These two components are connected by a pin and stabilized by brackets and pins. The boom and the rod are detached from their supports to assess the different stresses imposed on this structure, and a free-body diagram is drawn. Then, all the forces applied, including the load acting on the structure, are identified. The reaction forces exerted on both the boom and the rod are computed using the equilibrium equations.
The...
The...
409
Free-body Diagrams: Problem Solving
1.0K
Free-body diagrams are essential tools for physicists and engineers studying the motion of objects. Free-body diagrams are graphical representations of the object or system under consideration, and they focus solely on the essential forces acting on the object. This tool helps break down complex problems into simpler models that are easier to understand and solve.
For example, consider a block with a mass of 10 kg released on an inclined plane at an angle of 30° to the horizontal, where...
For example, consider a block with a mass of 10 kg released on an inclined plane at an angle of 30° to the horizontal, where...
1.0K

