Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision
Published on: February 11, 2014
Perceived Discrimination, Hypervigilance, and Visual Disabilities Among United States Adults: An Analysis of National
Patrick Akarapimand1, John C Lin1, Fasika Woreta2
1From the Department of Ophthalmology (P.A., J.C.L.), Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Objective:
To investigate the association between visual disability and discrimination.
Design:
Cross-sectional study.
Participants:
We employed data from the 2023 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), including only US adult participants who responded to both the NHIS modules on visual disability and discrimination.
Methods:
Visual disability was defined as any reported difficulty with seeing even when wearing glasses or contact lenses. Adjusted Wald tests were performed to compare discrimination and hypervigilance between people with and without visual disabilities. Multiple ordinal regression models were employed to assess the associations between visual disability and Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) or Heightened Vigilance Scale (HVS), adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, household income, education level, and the number of chronic conditions such as arthritis, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, diabetes, and hypertension. Subgroup analyses across covariates were performed.
Main Outcomes Measures:
Discrimination was measured through 2 validated tools: the EDS, assessing the frequency of unfair treatment, and the HVS, measuring how often individuals anticipate or prepare for discrimination.
Results:
Total 28 615 adults were included in this study. 54.3% were female, 33.6% identified as from racial or ethnic minoritized backgrounds, and 19.6% reported having visual disabilities. The mean EDS score for people with visual disabilities was significantly higher than for those without disabilities (3.28 vs 2.30, P < .001), as well as the mean HVS score (4.12 vs 3.19, P < .001). In multiple ordinal regression, visual disability was significantly associated with higher scores on the EDS (adjusted OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.62-1.87) and higher scores on the HVS (adjusted OR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.51-1.72). This result was replicated across age and sex subgroup analyses.
Conclusions:
People with visual disabilities reported more frequent discrimination and heightened vigilance. This underscores the urgent need for coordinated efforts across multiple sectors, such as healthcare, education, employment, and transportation, to address the discrimination faced by people with visual disabilities.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways
Surveys
Stereotype Content Model

