Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2025

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
Published on: May 20, 2018
Program Signaling in Emergency Medicine: Applicant Trends and Outcomes From the 2023 and 2024 Match
Andrew D Luo1,2, Christopher Zeuthen2, Elizabeth Barrall Werley3
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Background:
Program signals were introduced to the emergency medicine (EM) residency application process during the 2022-2023 and 2023-2024 application cycles, allowing applicants to express interest in specific programs. Despite widespread adoption, the relationship between signal usage and applicant outcomes remains poorly understood. This study evaluates patterns of signal utilization and their association with interview offers and match outcomes during the initial implementation in EM.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency (Texas STAR) database, examining US allopathic and osteopathic senior medical students applying to EM residency programs during two application cycles (2022-2023 and 2023-2024). We analyzed program signal (PS) distribution patterns using χ 2 testing and employed multivariable logistic regression to assess the relationship between PS usage and both interview offers and match outcomes.
Results:
The study included 967 EM applicants across two application cycles (478 in 2022-2023, 489 in 2023-2024), who sent 1919 signals in 2022-2023 and 3170 in 2023-2024. Signal distribution was highly concentrated, with the top 10% of programs receiving 35% of all signals in both application cycles. Interview yield was higher at signaled programs (2023 cycle: 76.3%, 2024 cycle: 78.9%) compared to programs overall (2023 cycle: 51.3%, 2024 cycle: 43.5%). In logistic regression analysis, sending a program signal was associated with increased odds of receiving an interview offer (2023 cycle: OR 4.40, 95% CI 3.90-4.92; 2024 cycle: OR 3.79, 95% CI 3.42-4.14), and matching after interviewing (2023 cycle: OR 5.13, 95% CI 4.08-6.47; 2024 cycle: OR 4.94, 95% CI 3.98-6.15).
Conclusion:
Program signals are associated with improved odds of receiving interviews and matching at EM programs. Future studies should investigate how signals affect the likelihood of receiving interview offers for applicants across different levels of competitiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Current Trends in Nursing I
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Current Trends in Nursing II
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies

