Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

A Detailed Protocol for Physiological Parameters Acquisition and Analysis in Neurosurgical Critical Patients
Published on: October 17, 2017
Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring at the Surgical Ward for Improved Outcomes After Major Noncardiac Surgery: A
Jesper Mølgaard1, Katja K Grønbæk2, Søren S Rasmussen3
1From the Department of Anesthesia, Centre for Cancer and Organ Dysfunction, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Background:
Complications occur in a third of patients after major noncardiac surgery and are often preceded by vital sign deviations undetected by current vital sign monitoring practice, despite major advances in surgical and perioperative care. Continuous wireless vital sign monitoring with real-time alerts may allow for a reduction of vital sign abnormalities and complications.
Methods:
Adult patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery were included and randomized to either standard of care (manual intermittent vital sign monitoring) vs standard of care plus continuous wireless vital sign monitoring with real-time vital sign alerts to staff smartphones at the general postoperative ward. The primary outcome was cumulative duration of severe vital sign deviations, including desaturation, tachy- and bradycardia, tachy- and bradypnea, hypo- and hypertension. Secondary outcomes included adverse events within 30 days. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded to the randomization.
Results:
Four hundred patients were randomized, with 200 in the intervention and 200 in the control group, respectively. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] duration of severely deviating vital signs was 60 [25-136] vs 76 [28-192] min/d in the intervention versus control group, respectively ( P = .19). Duration of Sp o2 <88% had a mean reduction of 47 minutes per day (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-80, P = .02). Adverse events occurred in 42.5% vs 31.5% of patients within 30 days ( P = .02), and serious adverse events in 34.5% vs 29.5% ( P = .39).
Conclusions:
Continuous vital sign monitoring with real-time staff alerts did not significantly reduce cumulative severe vital sign deviations in this setup. Significant reductions in desaturations and adverse events were found, giving evidence to future studies in the use of continuous vital sign monitoring to improve patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
05:39Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
14:28Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
Published on: May 10, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Introduction to Vital Signs
Vital signs help healthcare professionals assess an individual's well-being and detect any functional changes...
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.