Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving01:06

Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving

4.4K
In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
4.4K
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness01:14

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness

1.9K
Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
1.9K
Reinforcement01:23

Reinforcement

350
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
350
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

318
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
318
Masking and Demasking Agents01:19

Masking and Demasking Agents

2.7K
EDTA titrations may necessitate masking and demasking agents to temporarily protect a particular metal ion in a mixture from the EDTA reaction. These agents facilitate the sequential analysis of the metal ions by forming stable complexes with some—but not all—metal ions during certain steps.
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...
2.7K
Associative Learning01:27

Associative Learning

596
Associative learning is a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology, wherein a connection is established between two stimuli or events, leading to a learned response. This process is critical in understanding how behaviors are acquired and modified. Conditioning, the mechanism through which associations are formed, can be divided into two main types: classical conditioning and operant conditioning, each elucidating different aspects of associative learning.
Classical conditioning, also known...
596

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aligning Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Decision Analysis With Contemporary Risk Conceptualizations: Insights From the Ellsberg Paradox and Related Concepts.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

Looking for a Straw in a Haystack by Bridging the Cracks Between Individual Judgments: Narrowing the Knowledge Gap To Anticipate Surprises by Transforming Risk Assessors' Small Worlds Into Large Worlds.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

How Safety Science Can Be Strengthened by Clarifying Its Foundation and Increasing Its Interaction With Risk Science.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

Unlocking the potential of computational phenotypic drug discovery: methods, challenges, and future directions.

NPJ systems biology and applications·2026
Same author

Risk-Resilience Feedback to Assure Critical Societal Functions.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

Risk Science in Practice: A Framework for Gauging Risk Principles in Domain-Specific Discourse.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.1K

Risk-aware autonomous search and rescue with multiagent reinforcement learning.

Aowabin Rahman1, Salman Shuvo1, Samrat Chatterjee2

  • 1Optimization and Control Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|July 5, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a risk-aware multiagent reinforcement learning approach for autonomous search and rescue (SAR) robots navigating uncertain environments. The method addresses adversarial risks and evolving conditions for safer robotic navigation.

Keywords:
multiagent reinforcement learningrisk‐aware autonomous navigationsearch and rescue

More Related Videos

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum
07:52

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Published on: February 12, 2017

8.8K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.1K
Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum
07:52

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Published on: February 12, 2017

8.8K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Reinforcement Learning

Background:

  • Autonomous navigation in dynamic, high-consequence environments like search and rescue (SAR) missions is critical.
  • Multiagent robotic systems face challenges adapting to changing conditions and adversarial risks.
  • Deviations in learned actions and evolving environmental obstacles impact autonomous agent performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a risk-aware multiagent reinforcement learning approach for autonomous SAR.
  • To mathematically formulate the autonomous SAR problem considering adversarial and environmental uncertainties.
  • To evaluate the proposed approach in diverse hazard scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Formulated the autonomous SAR problem using a risk-aware multiagent reinforcement learning framework.
  • Designed and implemented numerical experiments for evaluation.
  • Employed a centralized training with decentralized testing (CTDE) paradigm.

Main Results:

  • The risk-aware multiagent reinforcement learning approach demonstrated effectiveness in handling dynamic and uncertain SAR environments.
  • The CTDE paradigm facilitated robust performance of autonomous agents under adversarial conditions.
  • Experimental results validated the approach's adaptability to evolving obstacles.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed risk-aware multiagent reinforcement learning approach offers a promising solution for enhancing autonomous navigation in SAR missions.
  • Further research is needed to explore advanced adaptation strategies and real-world deployment.
  • The study highlights the importance of risk-awareness in multiagent systems for high-consequence applications.