Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Multiplex Chemical Imaging Based on Broadband Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy
Published on: July 25, 2022
A comparative study of robustness to noise and interpretability in U-Net-based denoising of Raman spectra
Azadeh Mokari1, Simone Eiserloh2, Oleg Ryabchykov1
1Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology, Member of Research Alliance "Leibniz Health Technologies", Jena, 07745, Germany; Institute of Physical Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, 07743, Germany.
Abstract:
Raman spectroscopy is a valuable analytical technique for molecular characterization, but its practical application is often restricted by low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), especially at short integration times. These limitations are critical in time-sensitive applications where rapid spectral acquisition is required. Deep learning, in particular, U-Net-based models are becoming routine tools for denoising the spectra. However, such models are typically applied as black boxes that are only evaluated using performance metrics. In this study, we investigate how training strategies using spectra acquired at different integration times and thus varying noise levels, affect model generalization. Specifically, we compare two models trained with the same U-Net architecture: a Single-Condition (SC) model trained on spectra acquired with a single integration time, and a Multi-Condition (MC) model trained on a dataset combining multiple integration times. Besides the quantitative evaluation of the models using Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC), we apply interpretability techniques to gain deeper insight into how the models process spectral data. Saliency maps and Jacobian matrix analysis enable us to visualize which spectral regions the models focus on during denoising. This study highlights that training with diverse integration times significantly improves model generalization and denoising robustness. Moreover, our use of interpretability techniques reveals how different training strategies influence model focus and decision-making, offering a novel perspective on designing explainable and noise-resilient deep learning models for Raman spectroscopy.
More Related Videos
09:32Resolving Water, Proteins, and Lipids from In Vivo Confocal Raman Spectra of Stratum Corneum through a Chemometric Approach
Published on: September 26, 2019
09:46Direct Comparison of Hyperspectral Stimulated Raman Scattering and Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering Microscopy for Chemical Imaging
Published on: April 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Raman Spectroscopy: Overview
However, a small fraction of the scattered light exhibits a frequency shift due to the exchange of energy between the incident photons and...
Raman Spectroscopy Instrumentation: Overview
The monochromatic laser source, typically using visible or near-infrared radiation, generates a highly focused beam of light. This light interacts with the molecules of the sample, scattering some of the light. Liquid and gaseous samples are usually tested in ordinary glass capillaries, while solids can be analyzed as powders packed in capillaries or as potassium...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...