Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive Dissonance

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

Attribution Theory

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...

Blinding

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026

Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026

Same author

Imagining and building wise machines: the centrality of AI metacognition.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same author

Corrigendum to 'If not me, then who? Responsibility and replacement' [Cognition 242 (2024) 105646].

Cognition·2025

Same author

How children map causal verbs to different causes across development.

Nature human behaviour·2025

Same author

A signaling theory of self-handicapping.

Cognition·2025

Same journal

The decolonization of museums.

Current opinion in psychology·2026

Same journal

Contemporary antisemitism: Implications for cognitive behavioral therapy.

Current opinion in psychology·2026

Same journal

On the politicization and polarization of psychology: What psychologists can learn from psychologists.

Current opinion in psychology·2026

Same journal

An intergroup perspective on evolutionary scepticism.

Current opinion in psychology·2026

Same journal

Research on microaggressions and their impact assesses neither microaggressions nor their impact.

Current opinion in psychology·2026

Same journal

Racism in the science and practice of psychotherapy.

Current opinion in psychology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

A framework for blaming willful ignorance.

Lara Kirfel¹, Tobias Gerstenberg², Ro'i Zultan³

¹Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Germany.

Current Opinion in Psychology

|July 10, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Willful ignorance, the deliberate avoidance of knowledge, complicates moral responsibility and blame. This study explores psychological mechanisms behind how people assign blame to willfully ignorant individuals.

Keywords:

Blame Causality Epistemic state Responsibility Willful ignorance

More Related Videos

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Area of Science:

Moral Psychology
Cognitive Science
Philosophy of Law

Background:

Willful ignorance, the intentional avoidance of information, poses challenges to traditional notions of moral responsibility and legal culpability.
Recent psychological research investigates how individuals attribute blame in cases of willful ignorance, moving beyond traditional philosophical accounts.
Understanding blame attribution for willful ignorance is crucial for both ethical and legal frameworks.

Purpose of the Study:

To review and synthesize current research on how people assign blame to willfully ignorant agents.
To propose a theoretical framework explaining the psychological mechanisms underlying blame for willful ignorance.
To identify key factors influencing blame attributions and suggest future research directions.

Main Methods:

Literature review of psychological and philosophical studies on willful ignorance and blame.
Development of a theoretical framework integrating epistemic, counterfactual, and personal inference mechanisms.
Analysis of existing empirical evidence supporting the proposed explanatory factors.

Main Results:

Willful ignorance significantly impacts blame attributions, often leading to increased condemnation compared to ordinary ignorance.
Three primary mechanisms—epistemic, counterfactual, and personal inferences—explain how willful ignorance influences blame.
Evidence supports the role of these mechanisms in shaping judgments about responsibility.

Conclusions:

Willful ignorance is a distinct phenomenon that warrants specific consideration in discussions of moral and legal responsibility.
The proposed framework provides a comprehensive understanding of the psychological processes involved in blaming willfully ignorant individuals.
Further empirical research is needed to refine these mechanisms and their implications for real-world judgments.