Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

3.6K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.6K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

422
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
422
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

3.0K
Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
3.0K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.9K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
1.9K
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II01:18

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II

1.7K
The person's health status fluctuates continually, varying from being in good health to becoming ill and returning to being healthy. To understand the concept of illness prevention, there are two models. First, the health-illness continuum model is a graphic representation of an individual's wellness. It states that a person is considered healthy in the absence of physical disease and the presence of good emotional health.
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
1.7K
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation01:08

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.4K
A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Publisher Correction: A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity.

Nature·2026
Same author

Accelerometry-measured prolonged and interrupted sedentary behavior and cancer incidence and mortality: A cohort study of 91,292 UK Biobank participants.

PLoS medicine·2026
Same author

A 98-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer with all-to-all connectivity.

Nature·2026
Same author

Process evaluation of an intervention developed using a participatory approach targeting school-related sedentary behaviour among adolescents.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Preventing smoking initiation among vulnerable adolescents: a process evaluation of the KickAsh!-intervention in Flemish youth social work settings.

Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique·2026
Same author

Using participatory methods to develop context-specific local government actions to create healthy food and physical activity environments for school-aged children: a case study in Flanders.

Health research policy and systems·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K

Using formative evaluation to adapt a co-creation process within and between workplace contexts: A Health CASCADE

Mira Vogelsang1, Lauren McCaffrey1, Gemma C Ryde2

  • 1School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK.

Public Health
|July 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Formative evaluation enables adaptable co-creation processes for tailored health interventions. Documenting adaptations enhances transferability and public health impact in diverse workplace settings.

Keywords:
Co-creationEvaluationHealth promotionImplementationScalingSedentary Behaviour

More Related Videos

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
11:21

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data

Published on: July 27, 2018

8.3K
An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status
06:58

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status

Published on: February 3, 2022

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.0K
Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
11:21

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data

Published on: July 27, 2018

8.3K
An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status
06:58

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status

Published on: February 3, 2022

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Promotion
  • Intervention Design

Background:

  • Co-creation is a valuable method for developing tailored health promotion interventions.
  • Adaptability and responsiveness to context are essential for successful co-creation.
  • Formative evaluation facilitates continuous reflection and adaptation in intervention development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine adaptations within co-creation processes using formative evaluation.
  • To understand adaptations both within and between different workplace contexts.
  • To advance the evaluation, transferability, and public health impact of co-creation.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative study employing thematic analysis.
  • Co-creation process implemented in three small-to-medium-sized enterprises.
  • Data collected from pilot sessions, project meetings, co-creator feedback, and facilitator reflections.

Main Results:

  • Adaptations occurred at planned (pre-implementation) and responsive (during implementation) stages.
  • Reasons for adaptation included tailoring to context, enhancing process effectiveness, and fostering engagement.
  • Systematic linking of data to adaptations informed the modification process.

Conclusions:

  • Formative evaluation is critical for ensuring co-creation processes are relevant, effective, and engaging.
  • Skilled facilitators and end-user input are key components of successful co-creation.
  • Documenting adaptations is essential for replicating co-creation in new contexts while maintaining flexibility.