Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

10:10
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
43.4K
Indications for total elbow arthroplasty revision: a systematic review
James Satalich1, Matt Smith1, Sarah Whitaker2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA.
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
|July 11, 2025
Summary
Revision total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) rates remain high, with aseptic loosening being the primary cause for revision surgery. Understanding these failure mechanisms is crucial for patient counseling and improving outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Clinical Epidemiology
Background:
- Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a reconstructive procedure for end-stage elbow disease.
- Revision surgery following TEA is a complex procedure with varying success rates.
- Identifying indications for revision TEA is critical for optimizing patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and evaluate the primary indications for revision total elbow arthroplasty (TEA).
- To analyze the failure modes and reasons necessitating revision surgery after primary TEA.
- To provide updated insights into TEA failure mechanisms for improved clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases up to July 9, 2024.
- Studies investigating reasons for revision surgery after primary TEA were included.
- Exclusion criteria included case reports, non-English studies, and articles not reporting revision indications.
Main Results:
- Out of 589 initial studies, 46 met inclusion criteria, analyzing 8,911 primary TEAs.
- Aseptic loosening (48.5%) was the most frequent indication for revision, followed by infection (19.4%) and periprosthetic fractures (10.3%).
- Higher revision rates were observed in patients with nonunion (24.7%) and inflammatory arthritis (13.4%) compared to traumatic injuries.
Conclusions:
- Despite advancements, TEA revision rates remain substantial, with aseptic loosening as a key failure mode.
- Broadened indications for TEA and inherent biomechanical challenges may contribute to high revision rates.
- This review underscores the need for improved patient selection, surgical techniques, and further research into TEA failure contributors.

