Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026
Conjunctival Commensal Isolation and Identification in Mice
Published on: May 1, 2021
The Effect of Metagenomic Sequencing on Patient Clinical Outcomes for Intraocular Infections: A Multicenter
Jessica G Shantha1, Kareem Moussa2, Wipada Laovirojjanakul3
1From the Francis I. Proctor Foundation (J.G.S., W.A., D.Y., L.Z., C.C., K.D.S., A.H., T.P., B.F.A., J.G., N.R.A., T.M.L., T.D.), University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Ophthalmology (J.G.S., T.P., B.F.A., J.G., N.R.A., T.M.L., T.D.), University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Objective:
To determine whether the addition of an unbiased test, metagenomic sequencing of intraocular fluid, compared to standard-of-care diagnostics alone, leads to better patient outcomes in presumed infectious intraocular inflammatory eye diseases.
Design:
A randomized controlled trial was conducted from May 2022 through February 2024.
Participants:
Eligible participants had intraocular inflammation concerning for an infectious etiology, were 18 years or older, and had vision better than no light perception (NLP). This study enrolled participants at 6 tertiary referral eye centers in the United States (5 sites) and Thailand (1 site).
Interventions:
Participants were randomized to have their physician have access to deep sequencing results or not.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The main outcomes were (1) clinical improvement on examination at 4 weeks after randomization and (2) appropriate therapy administered by the treating physician as determined by an independent expert panel.
Results:
Among the 100 participants enrolled (median [IQR] age, 62.0 [47.5-71.0] years; 57 [57.0%] were women), 92 participants completed the study. Forty-one (41.0%) participants had resolution of inflammation at their 2-week follow-up and 23 (23.0%) participants had a pathogen identified with routine diagnostics and exited the study. Twenty-one (21.0%) participants met the criteria for randomization. At the primary endpoint, 8 (88.9%) patients in the metagenomic sequencing group had clinical improvement compared to 7 (63.6%) patients in the no metagenomic sequencing group (risk difference, 30% [95% CI: 0.6%-59.1%]; relative risk [RR] = 1.35 [95% CI: 1.01-1.81]; P = 0.045). Eight (88.9%) patients were considered to receive the appropriate therapy in the metagenomic sequencing group compared to 11 (100%) patients in the no metagenomic sequencing group (risk difference, -12.0% [95% CI: -38.0%-14.0%]; RR = 0.89 [95% CI: 0.68-1.15]; P = .37). There were 3 nonstudy related adverse events.
Conclusions:
Having access to metagenomic sequencing results modestly improved clinical outcomes in a subset of patients with suspected intraocular infections. Larger studies are needed to determine the long-term impact on management and clinical outcomes.
Trial Registration:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05286203.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:27Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
01:22Microbiome of the Eye