Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 15, 2025

Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
Peer Mentoring Improves Diabetes Technology Use and Reduces Diabetes Distress Among Underserved Communities: Outcomes
Jennifer Maizel1,2, Michael J Haller3, David M Maahs4
1Department of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Abstract:
Background: There are well-documented disparities in diabetes care outcomes and technology usage, stemming from differences in healthcare access, distrust in healthcare providers, and other factors. This study evaluated patient-level outcomes of a diabetes support coach (DSC) intervention aimed at improving underserved adults' diabetes technology use, diabetes distress, and HbA1c levels. Methods: As part of a Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Diabetes program, a social support intervention involving 28 DSCs was piloted at 33 Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in Florida and California from May 2021 to May 2022. DSCs, who were adults with diabetes, served in a capacity similar to peer mentors and community health workers and received uniform training/oversight by a clinical team. Intervention participants (n = 74 adults with insulin-requiring diabetes at FQHCs) self-enrolled and engaged with DSCs via text messages, phone calls, and events. Participants' outcomes were evaluated cross-sectionally via the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS-17) and a diabetes technology usage survey and longitudinally via HbA1c tests upon enrollment and at 6-month follow-up. A group of adults with insulin-requiring diabetes from the same FQHCs who did not receive the DSC intervention (n = 363) was used for comparison. Descriptive statistics were computed for all outcomes (n, percentage; mean, SD/95% CI). Between-group comparisons were evaluated via chi-squared and t-tests. Results: DSC intervention participants reported significantly lower diabetes distress than the comparison group (DDS-17 score mean = 1.6 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001), and significantly more participants in the DSC intervention regularly used continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) than the comparison group (69.9% vs. 38.8%, p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in insulin pump usage or HbA1c. Conclusions: Lower diabetes distress and greater CGM usage among intervention participants suggest that the DSCs' shared lived experiences and healthcare navigation support positively influenced underserved adults' outcomes. These findings show DSCs' potential for improving diabetes care and technology equity.
Related Concept Videos
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...

