Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

04:01
The Modified Single-working Portal Technique Using Lasso-loop Stitch with Needle for Arthroscopic Subscapularis Repair
Published on: August 8, 2025
71
Retinaculum Grafts in Scapholunate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
Lea Estermann1, Melodi Yong2, Blair S York1
1Victorian Hand Surgery Associates, Fitzroy, Australia.
Journal of Wrist Surgery
|July 21, 2025
Summary
Bone-retinaculum-bone (BRB) grafts show potential for scapholunate ligament reconstruction, offering pain relief and improved grip strength. However, insufficient data exists on their long-term efficacy and biomechanical properties.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Sports Medicine
Background:
- Chronic scapholunate (SL) ligament disruption often requires surgical intervention.
- Tendon grafts are commonly used, but retinaculum grafts offer an alternative.
- The bone-retinaculum-bone (BRB) graft is a specific type of retinaculum graft for SL reconstruction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the biomechanical and histological properties of the BRB graft.
- To evaluate the clinical outcomes of BRB graft use in SL ligament reconstruction.
- To identify gaps in current research regarding BRB grafts for SL instability.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of eight studies (five laboratory, three clinical) following abstract screening of 353 articles.
- Analysis of biomechanical data including load to failure and stiffness from cadaveric studies.
- Review of clinical outcomes such as pain relief, grip strength, range of motion, and radiological findings.
Main Results:
- Cadaveric studies indicated BRB grafts have lower load to failure and stiffness compared to the native SL ligament.
- Clinical studies showed BRB grafts provided pain relief and improved grip strength in dynamic SL instability, with a reduced range of motion.
- Radiological assessment revealed no SL widening at 18 months, but a slight increase after 12 years; clinical studies had a level of evidence of 4.
Conclusions:
- Current clinical, histological, and biomechanical data on BRB grafts for SL ligament reconstruction is insufficient.
- Further research is needed to fully understand graft incorporation, remodeling, and long-term outcomes.
- The limited evidence suggests potential benefits but highlights the need for more robust studies.
