Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

Scaled-Up Preparation of an Intermediate of Upatinib, ACT051-3
Published on: April 7, 2023
Cardiovascular and thromboembolic risks of JAK inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: A global cohort study
Khalaf Kridin1,2,3, Samer Kridin4, Eliza Mayer2,3
1Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Insights
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for atopic dermatitis (AD) show a slightly increased risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) compared to dupilumab and methotrexate. Careful patient selection and thrombotic risk assessment are crucial when prescribing JAK inhibitors.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Cardiovascular Safety
- Pharmacovigilance
Background:
- Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are increasingly prescribed for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).
- Concerns exist regarding the cardiovascular safety of JAK inhibitors, specifically thromboembolic risks.
- Real-world evidence in AD populations is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the real-world risk of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, pulmonary embolism (PE), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
- To compare these risks in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients treated with JAK inhibitors versus dupilumab, methotrexate, and cyclosporine.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the TriNetX global database for a real-world, retrospective cohort study.
- Conducted three propensity score-matched analyses comparing JAK inhibitor initiators with dupilumab, methotrexate, or cyclosporine users.
- Assessed the incidence of MI, stroke, PE, and DVT over a 3-year follow-up period.
Main Results:
- JAK inhibitors were associated with a significantly higher risk of PE (HR 2.75) and DVT (HR 2.54) compared to dupilumab.
- A significantly increased risk of DVT (HR 2.41) was observed with JAK inhibitors versus methotrexate.
- No statistically significant increase in MI or stroke risk was found for JAK inhibitors compared to any comparator.
Conclusions:
- Atopic dermatitis (AD) patients using JAK inhibitors face a slightly elevated risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) compared to those on dupilumab or methotrexate.
- These findings highlight the importance of judicious patient selection.
- Thrombotic risk assessment is essential prior to and during JAK inhibitor therapy for AD.
Introduction:
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are increasingly used for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). However, concerns have emerged regarding their cardiovascular safety profile, particularly the risk of thromboembolic complications. Evidence specific to AD populations remains sparse.
Objectives:
To evaluate the real-world risk of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among patients with AD treated with JAK inhibitors relative to those treated with dupilumab, methotrexate and cyclosporine.
Methods:
Using the TriNetX global database, we conducted three propensity score-matched analyses comparing AD patients initiating JAK inhibitors with those receiving dupilumab (n = 1006), methotrexate (n = 958) or cyclosporine (n = 948). The incidence of MI, stroke, PE and DVT over 3 years was assessed.
Results:
The risk of PE (hazard ratio [HR], 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 6.38; p = 0.014) and DVT (HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.14 to 5.64; p = 0.017) was significantly higher among patients treated with JAK inhibitors relative to dupilumab, with a risk difference of eight and nine additional cases of PE and DVT/1000 patients starting JAK inhibitors, respectively. Relative to methotrexate, JAK inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of DVT (HR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.14 to 5.08; p = 0.017), with a risk difference of seven additional cases/1000 patients starting JAK inhibitors. The risk of MI and stroke was not statistically elevated under JAK inhibitors in comparison to any of the comparators.
Conclusions:
JAK inhibitor use in patients with AD is associated with a slightly increased risk of PE and DVT compared to dupilumab and methotrexate. These findings underscore the need for careful patient selection and thrombotic risk assessment when prescribing JAK inhibitors.
Related Concept Videos
The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway
Allergic Drug Reactions
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
Skin Diseases and Disorders
Gram-positive Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. are responsible for many of the most common skin infections. However, many...
Antiasthma Drugs: Inhaled Corticosteroids and Glucocorticoids
ICS work through a multifaceted mechanism of action. They suppress the inflammatory response caused by the proliferation of TH cells. They also reduce the transcription of the IL-2 gene, which is involved in the...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...

