Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

09:25
A Protocol to Acquire the Degenerative Tenocyte from Humans
Published on: June 9, 2018
7.5K
YouTube Videos on Lateral Epicondylitis Often Lack High-Quality, Reliable Information
Jacob Q Lin1, Jacob Christopher1, Monty Khela1
1Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation
|July 22, 2025
Summary
YouTube videos on lateral epicondylitis offer millions of views but have low to moderate quality and reliability. Further investigation into online health information is crucial for patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Medical Education
- Digital Health
Background:
- Lateral epicondylitis is a prevalent condition frequently researched by patients online.
- The increasing popularity and volume of YouTube content necessitate an evaluation of its medical information quality.
- Assessing the reliability of online health resources is vital for informed patient decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality and reliability of YouTube videos concerning lateral epicondylitis (LE).
Main Methods:
- The top 50 YouTube videos for "lateral epicondylitis" were analyzed.
- Video reliability was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, Global Quality Score (GQS), and Lateral Epicondylitis Specific Score (LESS).
- Statistical analyses, including ANOVA and multivariate stepwise regressions, were employed to identify factors influencing video quality and reliability.
Main Results:
- Videos averaged over 300,000 views, with most content (40%) focusing on disease-specific information.
- Mean scores for JAMA criteria, GQS, and LESS were 2.69/4.0, 2.64/5.0, and 4.91/7.0, respectively.
- Academic sources and physician-created content generally scored higher in reliability and quality metrics, while longer video duration correlated with better scores.
Conclusions:
- Despite high viewership, YouTube videos on lateral epicondylitis demonstrate low to moderate information quality and reliability.
- Content creators, source type, and video characteristics significantly impact the assessed quality metrics.
- Ongoing assessment of online health information is essential due to its widespread use by patients.

