Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020
Advancements in Visual Field Testing: A Systematic Review of the 24-2C Test Grid
Eric Jin1, Natalie Shi Qi Wong1,2, Claire Xin Yi Goh1
1Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
The Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2C SITA-Faster test detects more central visual field defects (CVFDs) and is faster than the 24-2 grid. It shows substantial agreement with the 10-2 grid, aiding in CVFD screening.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Visual Science
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Visual field (VF) testing is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring glaucoma and other optic nerve disorders.
- Conventional VF indices and structure-function (S-F) concordance are key metrics for assessing visual impairment.
- Central visual field defects (CVFDs) can significantly impact daily function and require sensitive detection methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare the performance of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HVF) 24-2C SITA-Faster test against the 24-2 SITA-Standard/Faster and 10-2 SITA-Standard/Fast tests.
- To evaluate differences in conventional VF indices, CVFD detection, S-F concordance, and test characteristics.
- To determine the clinical utility of the HVF 24-2C SITA-Faster for screening central visual field defects.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of studies published up to August 30, 2024, was conducted.
- Eight studies involving 1239 subjects were analyzed, comparing HVF 24-2C SITA-Faster, 24-2 SITA-Standard/Faster, and 10-2 SITA-Standard/Fast tests.
- Key outcomes included VF indices, CVFD detection rates, S-F concordance, and test characteristics (speed, false positives/negatives, fixation losses).
Main Results:
- The 24-2C SITA-Faster demonstrated similar global VF indices to the 10-2 and 24-2 tests (ICC = 0.95 and 0.80, p < 0.001).
- It detected more VF defects and CVFD clusters with greater S-F concordance than the 24-2 SITA-Standard/Faster.
- While the 10-2 SITA-Standard/Fast detected more CVFDs, the 24-2C showed substantial agreement (ĸ = 0.488 to 0.708) and was faster with fewer fixation losses than the 24-2 Standard.
Conclusions:
- The HVF 24-2C SITA-Faster is a quicker and more effective test for identifying CVFDs compared to the 24-2 grid.
- It exhibits high agreement with the 10-2 grid, making it a valuable tool for screening central visual field defects.
- The test offers a balance of speed, detection capability, and diagnostic accuracy for clinical use.
More Related Videos
06:25Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
Published on: February 23, 2024
07:12Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025