Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

Culturing, Freezing, Processing, and Imaging of Entire Organoids and Spheroids While Still in a Hydrogel
Published on: December 23, 2022
Superhydrophobicity Effects on Spheroid Formation, Structure, and Viability on Co-Culture Conditions
María Del Carmen Morán1,2, Francesca Cirisano3, Michele Ferrari2,3
1Departament de Bioquímica i Fisiologia, Secció de Fisiologia, Facultat de Farmàcia i Ciències de l'Alimentació, Universitat de Barcelona, Avda. Joan XXIII, 27-31, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
None:
Background/Objectives: Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models more accurately simulate the in vivo tissue environments as compared to conventional two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cultures. Among these, spheroid cultures are particularly valuable for pharmaceutical research, as they allow for the study of tumor growth, drug responses, and cell-cell interactions in a physiologically relevant manner. Superhydrophobic surfaces (SHSs) have shown a promise in enhancing spheroid formation by reducing cell-substrate adhesion and promoting cell-cell aggregation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of two different SHS coatings (SHS1: fluorinated; SHS2: silicone-based) in generating co-culture spheroids composed of non-tumoral fibroblasts (3T3) and tumoral epidermoid carcinoma cells (A431), thereby mimicking aspects of the tumor microenvironment. Methods: Co-cultures of 3T3 and A431 cells were seeded at varying ratios onto SHS1 and SHS2 substrates to assess their ability to support 3D spheroid formation. Spheroids were characterized by measurements of circularity and size distribution, viability through live/dead staining, and surface topography using 3D profilometry. Results: Spheroid formation was significantly influenced by both the surface properties and the fibroblast-to-carcinoma cell ratio. The fluorinated SHS1 surface facilitated superior cell viability and promoted the formation of well-rounded, uniform spheroids. In contrast, the silicone-based SHS2 surface resulted in less defined spheroidal structures and lower overall viability. Profilometry confirmed more consistent and compact 3D architectures on SHS1. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that SHS1, a fluorinated superhydrophobic coating, is more effective than SHS2 in supporting the formation of viable and structurally coherent 3D co-culture spheroids. These findings underscore the potential of SHS1 as a low-cost, tunable platform for developing in vitro cancer models and advancing the study of tumor-stroma interactions.
More Related Videos
10:44Author Spotlight: In Vitro Hydrogel Model for Glioblastoma Microenvironment Study
Published on: September 22, 2023
08:43Author Spotlight: Standardizing Spheroid Formation Methods for Metabolic and Oxygenation Analysis Using Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cohesion
On a surface,...
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Hydration of Cement
Porosity and Absorption of Aggregate
When all pores in an aggregate are filled with water, the aggregate is considered saturated and surface-dry. If left in dry air, water will evaporate until the aggregate...
Factors Affecting Workability
Microbial Morphologies