Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Comparison between Two Zurich Cementless Total Hip Replacement Cup Impactor Types in the Accuracy of Cup Positioning:
Davide Mancusi1, Bruno Peirone1, Francesco Gallorini2
1Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy.
A new prototype impactor improved cup positioning accuracy for beginner surgeons, particularly for the angle of lateral opening in total hip replacements. Surgeon experience, not impactor type, influenced cup retroversion accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Surgical Instrumentation
Background:
- Accurate prosthetic cup positioning is crucial for successful total hip replacement (THR) outcomes.
- Surgeon experience and surgical tools can influence the precision of acetabular component placement.
- Variations in cup positioning may lead to complications such as dislocation or loosening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of two different cup impactors (standard vs. prototype) on the accuracy of prosthetic cup positioning in THR.
- To compare the performance of these impactors when used by surgeons with varying levels of experience (beginner vs. senior).
- To assess the influence of impactor design and surgeon experience on the angle of lateral opening and cup retroversion.
Main Methods:
- A cadaveric study involving 40 canine acetabula (n=20).
- Eighty prosthetic cups were impacted using a standard and a prototype Kyon impactor by a beginner and a senior surgeon.
- Radiographic imaging was used to measure the angle of lateral opening and cup retroversion, comparing them to ideal postoperative values.
Main Results:
- The senior surgeon's accuracy was unaffected by the impactor type for both measured angles.
- The beginner surgeon achieved significantly better accuracy for the angle of lateral opening with the prototype impactor compared to the standard one.
- No significant difference in cup retroversion accuracy was observed between the impactors, regardless of surgeon experience.
Conclusions:
- The prototype impactor's design and handling may aid less experienced surgeons in achieving optimal lateral opening angles during THR.
- Surgeon experience appears to be a more significant factor than impactor type in achieving accurate cup retroversion.
- Further research into surgical tool design can enhance precision and potentially improve patient outcomes in total hip replacement.
More Related Videos
09:31Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022