Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Knowledge Based Cloud FE Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Processes
Published on: December 13, 2016
Characterising 12 NiTi Reciprocating Systems: An Integrative Laboratorial Analysis of Design, Mechanics, Metallurgy,
Jorge N R Martins1,2,3,4, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva5,6, Mário Rito Pereira1,7
1Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Aim:
To comprehensively compare 12 nickel-titanium (NiTi) reciprocating single-file systems from eight manufacturers by integrating geometric, mechanical, metallurgical and in silico analyses.
Methodology:
A total of 276 NiTi reciprocating instruments, representing 12 types across 8 brands, were selected, including Easy-File Flex Regular 25, EdgeOne Fire Primary, Flash 25.06vt, One Files R25 and Blue R25, One RECI N25, Perfect RC R25 (Blue, Gold and Silver), Reciproc R25 (Blue and M-Wire) and WaveOne Gold Primary. They were evaluated using stereomicroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, 3D optical scanning, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry to assess design and metallurgical properties. Mechanical performance was tested via buckling resistance and microhardness. A micro-CT-based premolar model was virtually prepared for each instrument to simulate canal shaping. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) assessed irrigant penetration, wall shear stress and apical pressure. Finite element analysis (FEA) evaluated stress distribution in prepared roots. Data were analysed using the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality and the Kruskal-Wallis test for group comparisons (p < 0.05).
Results:
The systems differed considerably in spiral density, cross-sectional design, size, volume and phase transformation temperatures. Instruments with larger apical cores (One Files and Reciproc M-Wire) and austenitic-phase dominance (Perfect RC Silver and One Files) showed greater buckling strength. Files with martensitic phases (Perfect RC Gold, WaveOne Gold and One Files Blue) or hybrid cross-sections (One RECI and Flash) were more flexible. CFD revealed that conservative shaping (Easy-File Flex, EdgeOne Fire, One RECI, WaveOne Gold) increased wall shear stress but reduced apical irrigant exchange. FEA showed similar stress patterns across all groups, with lower stress in restored roots.
Conclusions:
Substantial variation exists among current NiTi reciprocating systems in terms of design, mechanics, fluid dynamics and metallurgy. Instruments with large cores and austenitic-phase structure provide superior buckling resistance. Conservative shaping improves shear stress but limits apical cleaning. Root stress remained consistent across systems. These findings highlight the importance of optimising instrument design and clinical protocols to balance shaping efficacy and irrigant delivery.
Related Concept Videos
Typical Model Studies
Equivalent Couples
Two couples are considered to be equivalent if they produce the same rotational effect on a rigid body. In other words, the two couples have the same magnitude and act in the same direction, causing the same angular displacement or acceleration in the body.
For instance, consider two couples lying in the plane of the page, with one having a pair of equal...
Dimensional Analysis
Dimensional analysis allows us to analyze and compare physical quantities on a...
Design of Transmission Shafts - Stress Analysis
Mechanical Systems
Bearings: Problem Solving

