Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 12, 2025

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
Self-Reported Attention to Positive Versus Negative Nutrients During Breakfast Cereal Selection Is Associated With
Christopher R Gustafson1, Henriette Gitungwa1, Devin J Rose2,3,4
1Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Focusing on positive nutrients, like fiber and iron, significantly improves healthy food choices compared to avoiding negative ones. Nutritional guidance emphasizing positive nutrients may be more effective for better dietary quality.
Area of Science:
- Nutrition Science
- Behavioral Economics
- Public Health
Background:
- Dietary guidelines often focus on limiting "negative" nutrients (e.g., sugar, sodium) rather than promoting "positive" ones (e.g., fiber, potassium).
- Understanding how consumers attend to different nutrient types influences their food choices and overall dietary quality.
- The impact of focusing on positive versus negative nutrient information on selecting healthier food options remains an area for exploration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between attention to positive or negative nutrients and the nutritional quality of ready-to-eat breakfast cereal selections.
- To compare the effectiveness of focusing on positive nutrients versus negative nutrients in guiding healthier food choices.
- To inform nutritional guidance strategies for improving public dietary habits.
Main Methods:
- An online survey involving 962 US adults who selected breakfast cereals from a display of 33 options with nutritional information.
- Participants reported their attention to specific positive (fiber, potassium, iron) and negative (energy, fat, sugar, sodium) nutrients after making their selection.
- Cereal healthfulness was assessed using the Guiding Stars (GS) rating, and ordinal logistic regression analyzed the relationship between nutrient attention and GS rating.
Main Results:
- Considering each positive nutrient increased the odds of selecting a higher GS-rated cereal by 2.83 times compared to considering no nutrients.
- Considering each negative nutrient increased the odds by 1.55 times, a significantly lower effect than considering positive nutrients.
- Individuals focusing solely on positive nutrients or both positive and negative nutrients selected significantly healthier cereals (higher GS ratings) than those focusing only on negative nutrients.
Conclusions:
- Nutritional guidance emphasizing the inclusion of positive nutrients may be more effective in improving the nutritional quality of food choices than messages focused on avoiding negative nutrients.
- Highlighting beneficial nutrients like fiber, potassium, and iron can empower consumers to make healthier breakfast cereal selections.
- Future dietary recommendations should consider a balanced approach, potentially prioritizing the promotion of positive nutrient intake.
Related Concept Videos
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
Optimal Foraging
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Regulation of Food Intake
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the...

