Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

A Novel Approach to Monitoring Graft Neovascularization in the Human Gingiva
Published on: January 12, 2019
Volumetric buccal bone alterations at immediate implant sites with or without soft tissue augmentation: A 6-month
Mary Jung1, Duong Tran2,3, Chi-Ching Chang1,4,5
1Department of Periodontics and Dental Hygiene, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Dentistry, Houston, Texas, USA.
Background:
This study is part of a randomized controlled trial investigating the impact of soft tissue augmentation (STA) using subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) (immediate implant with subepithelial connective tissue graft [ICT] group) or acellular dermal matrix (ADM) (immediate implant with acellular dermal matrix [IAD] group) versus no STA (control) on the clinical outcomes following immediate implant placement (IIP). This study aimed to investigate volumetric buccal bone dimensional changes at immediate implant sites 6 months after the surgery.
Methods:
Forty-five patients requiring extraction of a maxillary anterior tooth or premolar and randomly assigned to one of the three groups were included. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained prior to tooth extraction and 6 months after IIP and then superimposed to evaluate 3D (volumetric) and 2D (linear) changes in buccal bone dimensions around the implant. Measurements included three regions of interest (coronal, middle, and apical segments). The associations between clinical factors and 3D buccal bone dimensional changes were analyzed using linear regression analysis. The correlations between 3D and 2D measurements were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Statistical significance was assessed using an alpha level of 0.05.
Results:
Volumetric bone dimensional changes were not significantly different between the groups. The greatest amount of bone loss occurred in the coronal segment (ICT: -14.99 ± 4.29 mm3; IAD: -13.60 ± 3.97 mm3; Control: -12.58 ± 4.09 mm3; p = 0.286). The thick bone morphotype was significantly associated with increased absolute volumetric bone loss (p = 0.001, 0.041, and 0.013 for coronal, middle, and apical segments, respectively). Measurements of 3D and 2D bone dimensional changes had low to high correlations (range 0.39-0.95) in different segments.
Conclusion:
STA did not significantly affect bone dimensional loss at 6 months. Linear measurements may not fully represent volumetric bone dimensional changes at immediate implant sites.
Clinical Trial Registration:
This study is part of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT02864862). The title of the trial is Esthetic Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Combined with Soft Tissue Augmentation.
Plain Language Summary:
This study investigated how soft tissue augmentation (STA) affected the changes in bone around dental implants placed immediately after tooth extraction. Specifically, it compared the use of a connective tissue graft and an acellular dermal matrix against no STA. Forty-five patients who needed a maxillary anterior tooth or premolar extraction and a dental implant were included. Before the extraction and 6 months after implant placement, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken to measure changes in the bone dimensions around the implants. The analysis included three sections of the bone: the coronal, middle, and apical sections. The results showed no significant differences in bone changes between the different treatment groups. The greatest bone loss was found in the coronal section. Measurements taken in three dimensions (3D) and two dimensions (2D) showed varying degrees of correlation. Overall, the findings suggested that STA did not affect bone loss around dental implants, and 2D measurements may not accurately reflect the 3D changes in bone.
More Related Videos
08:41Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
Published on: August 13, 2019
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Bone Remodeling
Bone Markings
Articulating Projections
Articulating projections are found where two bones meet to form a joint. These structures are usually found at the ends of bones. The largest articulation is a rounded projection called the head, supported by a narrow neck at the ends of...
Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification
The process begins when mesenchymal cells in the embryonic skeleton gather together and differentiate into osteogenic cells, which then develop into...
Changes in the Appendicular Skeleton with Age
Initially, the limb buds consist of a core of mesenchyme covered by a layer of ectoderm. The ectoderm at the end of the limb bud thickens to form a narrow crest called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ridge stimulates the underlying...
Bone Formation by Endochondral Ossification