Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2025
The Synthesis, Characterization and Reactivity of a Series of Ruthenium N-triphosPh Complexes
Published on: April 10, 2015
Spectroscopic and Theoretical Studies of Ruthenium Complexes with a Noninnocent N2S2 Ligand in Different Redox States
Javier A Luna1, Kyle D Spielvogel1, Nathan R Loutsch1
1Department of Chemistry, The University of Iowa, E331 Chemistry Building, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Abstract:
Herein we report an electronic structure investigation of neutral and oxidized Ru complexes containing a redox noninnocent N2S2 ligand derived from o-phenylenediamide (L1). UV-vis spectroelectrochemistry (SEC) studies were conducted on the square pyramidal complex [RuII(L1)(PPh3)] (1) and the six-coordinate complexes [RuII(μ-BH3)(L1)(PPh3)] (2) - which has BH3 bound in a metal-ligand cooperative (MLC) fashion across Ru and L1 - and [RuII(L1)(PPh3)(MeCN)] (3). The SEC results yielded spectra assigned to singly and doubly oxidized 1 and 3, revealing electronic structure changes as a function of oxidation state and in response to the presence and absence of bound MeCN. By contrast, the SEC results of 2 showed that it rapidly loses MLC-bound BH3 upon oxidation. The SEC results for 1 and 3 were compared to single-crystal XRD data and UV-vis, EPR, and P K-edge, S K-edge, and Ru L3-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) data collected on isolated samples of chemically oxidized 3. The data revealed that the first two oxidations are primarily localized on the ligand, which was supported by DFT and TDDFT calculations. DFT calculations for the doubly oxidized species revealed a singlet ground state with a singlet-triplet gap of 8.9 kcal/mol. CASPT2 calculations corroborated the DFT calculations and further revealed that the singlet ground state is multiconfigurational with 21% radical character. Collectively, the results establish redox formalisms and the underlying electronic structure of Ru complexes containing a noninnocent tetradentate ligand in different oxidation states.
Related Concept Videos
02:58Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
02:51Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
02:42Valence Bond Theory
03:02Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human...
02:34Structural Isomerism
Isomers are different chemical species that have the same chemical formula. Structural isomerism of coordination compounds can be divided into two subcategories, the linkage isomers and coordination-sphere isomers.
Linkage isomers occur when the coordination compound contains a ligand that can bind to the transition metal center through two different atoms. For example, the CN− ligand can bind through the carbon atom or through the nitrogen atom. Similarly, SCN− can...
02:46Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...