Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

35.5K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
35.5K
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

40.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
40.0K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

45.4K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
45.4K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

41.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
41.0K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

33.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
33.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How watching sports shapes zero-sum thinking: Correlational, experimental, and longitudinal evidence.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same author

Exploring the counteractive effects of mandating diversity training: Solution aversion, reactance, and polarized social beliefs.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same author

Structure in transition: The role of structure in facilitating workplace efficacy and belonging for military veterans and civilians.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Megastudy testing 25 treatments to reduce antidemocratic attitudes and partisan animosity.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

When and Why Antiegalitarianism Affects Resistance to Supporting Black-Owned Businesses.

Psychological science·2024
Same author

Can selecting the most qualified candidate be unfair? Learning about socioeconomic advantages and disadvantages reduces the perceived fairness of meritocracy and increases support for socioeconomic diversity initiatives in organizations.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K

Solution spillover: Pairing issues with ideological solutions fuels polarization.

Adrienne M Kafka1, Troy H Campbell2, Aaron C Kay1

  • 1Fuqua School of Business, Management & Organizations, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|August 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Political beliefs shape issue importance. Solution aversion and attraction can polarize how people view neutral issues, especially when linked to partisan solutions. Zero-sum beliefs exacerbate this polarization effect.

Keywords:
motivated reasoningpolarizationsolution attractionsolution aversionzero-sum beliefs

More Related Videos

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

75.6K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K
How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

75.6K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.1K

Area of Science:

  • Political Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • American Politics

Background:

  • Political polarization is extensively studied in terms of ideology and affect.
  • Polarization of issue salience, or the perceived importance of issues, is less understood.
  • Underlying psychological drivers of issue salience polarization require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the psychological mechanisms driving issue salience polarization.
  • To test the roles of solution aversion and solution attraction in polarizing issue salience.
  • To examine the influence of zero-sum beliefs on issue salience polarization.

Main Methods:

  • Four experimental studies were conducted to test the proposed hypotheses.
  • Research design involved pairing ideologically neutral issues with ideologically aligned/opposed solutions.
  • Data collection likely involved surveys or controlled experiments measuring issue salience.

Main Results:

  • Issue salience polarization emerged when issues were presented with ideologically congruent or incongruent solutions.
  • Solution aversion and solution attraction were demonstrated as key psychological drivers.
  • Zero-sum beliefs were found to play a significant role in exacerbating this polarization.

Conclusions:

  • Psychological processes like solution aversion and attraction can create issue salience polarization.
  • Even ideologically neutral issues can become polarized when framed with partisan solutions.
  • Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for addressing political polarization in the United States.