Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 7, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
Published on: November 10, 2010
How watching sports shapes zero-sum thinking: Correlational, experimental, and longitudinal evidence
Jinseok S Chun1, Hemant Kakkar2, Aaron C Kay3
1SKK Business School, Sungkyunkwan University.
Abstract:
The popularity of professional sports has increased exponentially in recent decades. Although prior social psychological research has emphasized how sports foster group identification and social bonding, we show that consuming sports-related content has an unintended cognitive consequence: strengthening zero-sum beliefs. Specifically, watching and following sports increases the belief that success inherently requires others to lose. Across two correlational studies (Studies 1 and 2, Ns = 788, 1,994), two experiments (Studies 3 and 4, Ns = 1,164, 585), and one longitudinal study (Study 5, N = 830) conducted in the United States and India, we find that watching and following sports is both correlationally and causally associated with zero-sum thinking. These effects extend beyond sports contexts to shape attitudes toward immigrants and a distributive (win-lose) orientation in negotiation. Together, our findings reveal how sports engagement can systematically influence social cognition and broader worldviews. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Related Concept Videos
Social Facilitation
Robbers Cave
Conservation of Linear Momentum for a System of Particles
The impulsive force at play during this interaction is of extremely short duration, rendering its impulse negligible. When...
Energy Diagrams - II
The point in the energy diagram at which the system’s potential energy is the lowest is known as the local minima. The system tends to stay in this position indefinitely unless acted upon by a net force. The slope of the potential energy diagram at the local minima is zero, indicating that zero net force is acting on the system. The...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Counterfactual Thinking

