Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Evaluating AI Responses to Postoperative Questions in Mohs Reconstruction
Areeb Shah1, Luke Schwetschenau1, Lisa Velez-Velez2
1Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Introduction:
Patients frequently ask questions after Mohs facial reconstruction. AI tools, particularly large language models (LLMs), may optimize this communication.
Objectives And Hypotheses:
We evaluated four LLMs-Claude AI, ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Gemini-on responses to postoperative questions, hypothesizing variation in quality, accuracy, comprehensiveness, and readability.
Study Design:
Prospective observational study following STROBE guidelines.
Methods:
A total of 31 common postoperative questions were created. Each was submitted to all four LLMs using a standardized prompt. Responses were evaluated by blinded facial plastic surgeons using validated scoring tools (EQIP, Likert scales, readability formulas). IRB exemption was granted.
Results:
Claude AI outperformed others in quality (EQIP: 90.3), accuracy (4.55/5), and comprehensiveness (4.60/5). All LLMs exceeded the recommended 6th-grade reading level.
Conclusion:
LLMs show potential for supporting postoperative communication, but variation in readability and content depth highlights the continued need for physician oversight.
Related Concept Videos
Non-equilibrium in the Cell
Machines: Problem Solving I
The toggle clamp system is a machine structure consisting of movable, pin-connected multi-force members that form a stabilized system to transmit forces. The...
Machines: Problem Solving II

