Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
Learning instrumental variable representation for debiasing in recommender systems
Zhirong Huang1, Shichao Zhang1, Debo Cheng2
1Key Lab of Education Blockchain and Intelligent Technology, Ministry of Education, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi, China; Guangxi Key Lab of Multi-Source Information Mining and Security, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi, China.
None:
Recommender systems are essential for filtering content to match user preferences. However, traditional recommender systems often suffer from biases inherent in the data, such as popularity bias. These biases, particularly those stemming from latent confounders, can result in inaccurate recommendations and reduce both the diversity and effectiveness of the system. Existing debiasing methods for recommender systems, however, either fail to account for latent confounders or rely on predefined instrumental variables (IVs). To address this research gap, we propose a novel causality-based recommendation algorithm, Data-driven IV representation learning for debiasing in Recommender System (DIVRS), which enables the learning of IV representation directly from user-item interaction data. By leveraging the learned IV representation, DIVRS decomposes user behaviour into causal and confounding relationships to address potential bias in recommender systems. Additionally, we introduce Orthogonal Promotion Regularisation (OPR) for DIVRS to address the problem that Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) amplify bias. We also propose a variant of GCNs for DIVRS, called DIVRS-GCN. Experimental results on the Douban-Movie and Movielens-10M datasets demonstrate that both DIVRS and DIVRS-GCN effectively mitigate confounding bias while outperform the state-of-the-art methods in recommendation performance. For example, on both datasets, our DIVRS and DIVRS-GCN improve Recall@20 by up to 10.98 %. This validates their effectiveness and robustness. Our approaches improve recommendation accuracy while delivering more balanced and diverse suggestions, effectively addressing the limitations of existing IV-based recommender systems.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
08:27Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Hindsight Biases
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Confirmation Biases
Regression Toward the Mean
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...