Automated assessment of upper limb spasticity in stroke patients with fusion of multichannel surface electromyography
Xin Li1, Feiyu Nong1, Xu Zhang2
1Department of Rehabilitation, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to investigate a more accurate and efficient technique for assessing spasticity in stroke patients via surface electromyography (sEMG).
Methods:
45 hemiplegic individuals were recruited and spasticity was assessed via the modified Ashworth scale (MAS). Multichannel sEMG data were collected from 3 muscles: the long head of the biceps brachii (LB), the short head of the biceps brachii (SB), and the brachioradialis (BR). Both time-domain and frequency-domain features were extracted. A K-nearest neighbour (k-NN) classifier was used to develop a new feature vector consisting of multichannel sEMG features. Finally, a model using this new feature was constructed and evaluated for classification accuracy.
Results:
Data from 40 patients were analysed, revealing significant correlations between MAS scores and sEMG features. Specifically, MAS exhibited strong positive correlations with 3 time-domain features: root mean square (RMS), integral sEMG (iEMG), and envelope area (EA) (r > 0.7). In contrast, frequency-domain features were negatively correlated with the MAS score (r < -0.7). A single-channel model and a single-feature model were developed as baselines. A k-NN classifier using a novel feature vector - -integrating single-channel and single-feature data - enabled automatic spasticity grading, surpassing the performance of the baseline models. The proposed multichannel sEMG feature fusion model achieved an average accuracy of 78.7%, significantly outperforming both the single-channel model (LB: 66.0%, SB: 64.3%, BR: 70.4%) and the single-feature model (RMS 70.8%, iEMG 71.4%, and EA 63.4%).
Conclusions:
Compared with single-channel and single-feature models, the k-NN model, which uses multichannel sEMG features, has superior accuracy in spasticity assessments and is a reliable tool for objective evaluation. This approach holds promise for enhancing rehabilitation strategies by enabling precise and data-driven efficacy assessments, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
