Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

09:43
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Rice Breeding with CRISPR/Cas for Obtaining Optimal Phenotypic and Agronomic Traits
Published on: January 3, 2025
3.3K
Prime editing using paired pegRNAs targeting NG- or NGG-PAM in rice
Ayako Nishizawa-Yokoi1, Keiko Iida1,2, Akiko Mori1
1Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba, Japan.
Frontiers in Genome Editing
|September 15, 2025
Summary
Prime editing (PE) offers precise genome editing. This study compares wild-type PE (PE-wt) and a variant (PE-NG) using engineered pegRNAs, finding PE-wt efficient even with distal PAMs, while PE-NG shows low efficiency at NGC-PAM sites in rice.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genome Engineering
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Prime editing (PE) facilitates precise genome modifications, including base substitutions, insertions, and deletions.
- Engineered pegRNAs (epegRNAs) with RNA pseudoknot sequences enhance PE system stability.
- Existing PE systems often require specific protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) configurations that limit target site accessibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficiency of a wild-type SpCas9-based PE system (PE-wt) and an nSpCas9-NG variant-based PE system (PE-NG) using paired epegRNAs.
- To evaluate PE efficiency across different PAM configurations (NGG, NG) and target site distances.
- To assess the applicability of PE-NG in rice, particularly at NGC-PAM sites.
Main Methods:
- Utilized PE-wt with paired epegRNAs targeting a distal NGG-PAM.
- Employed PE-NG with paired epegRNAs targeting adjacent NG-PAMs.
- Introduced substitution and deletion mutations in target genes using both PE systems.
- Compared editing frequencies between PE-wt and PE-NG across various PAM types (NGG, CCN, NGA, NGT, NGC).
Main Results:
- PE-wt demonstrated efficient genome editing at distal NGG-PAM sites.
- PE-NG showed comparable efficiency to PE-wt when targeting NGA and NGT-PAM sites.
- PE-NG exhibited significantly lower editing efficiency at NGC-PAM sites in rice compared to PE-wt.
Conclusions:
- PE-wt is effective for genome editing even when targeting distal PAM sites.
- PE-NG expands PE applicability but shows reduced efficiency at specific NGC-PAM sites in rice.
- The choice of PE system and PAM compatibility is crucial for optimizing genome editing strategies in plants.
Related Concept Videos
RNA Editing
9.8K
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification where a precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) nucleotide sequence is changed by base insertion, deletion, or modification. The extent of RNA editing varies from a few hundred bases, in mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes, to a just single base, in nuclear genes of mammals. Even a single base change in the pre-mRNA can convert a codon for one amino acid into the codon for another amino acid or a stop codon. This type of re-coding can significantly affect the...
9.8K
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing
1.7K
The CRISPR-Cas system serves as a bacterial defense mechanism against invading genetic elements such as viruses and plasmids, forming the foundation for its adaptation as a powerful genome-editing tool. Originally discovered in prokaryotes, this system has been repurposed to revolutionize genetic engineering across a wide range of organisms, including plants, animals, and humans. The core component, Cas9, is an endonuclease derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, capable of introducing...
1.7K

