Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Delayed Esophagectomy After Chemoradiation Is Not Associated With Increased Mortality or Recurrence.
Daniel P Dolan1, Geriam Ruiz-Barreto2, Miles McAllister3
1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Delayed esophagectomy after chemoradiation (CROSS) did not worsen esophageal cancer survival or recurrence. However, longer waits increased comorbidities and postoperative complications.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Esophageal cancer treatment often involves neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CROSS) followed by esophagectomy.
- The optimal timing for esophagectomy after CROSS is debated.
- Delayed surgery may increase patient comorbidities and complicate recovery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of delayed esophagectomy on overall survival in esophageal cancer patients treated with CROSS.
- To compare outcomes between patients undergoing esophagectomy within 60 days versus after 60 days post-CROSS.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of a prospective database of 197 esophageal cancer patients who underwent CROSS and esophagectomy.
- Comparison of preoperative characteristics, postoperative adverse events, recurrence, and survival rates between a standard group (≤60 days) and a delayed group (>60 days).
Main Results:
- No significant differences in overall survival or recurrence rates were observed between the standard and delayed surgery groups.
- Delayed esophagectomy patients were older, had higher comorbidity scores, and more pre-existing conditions.
- The delayed group experienced increased major postoperative adverse events (OR 2.26).
Conclusions:
- A delay in esophagectomy beyond 60 days after CROSS is not associated with worse oncologic outcomes (recurrence or survival).
- Despite increased comorbidities and postoperative complications, delayed surgery did not negatively impact survival.
- These findings support flexibility in surgical timing after CROSS therapy.
More Related Videos
04:05Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for the Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Total Gastrectomy with Esophagojejunostomy
Published on: August 22, 2025
12:45Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...