Examination of the Association Between History of Self-Reported Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurocognitive

Wenjing Meng1, Florin Vaida, Nicola L de Souza

  • 1Author Affiliations: Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Division of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California (Ms Meng and Dr Vaida); Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (Dr de Souza); Department of Neurology, George E. Whalen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (Dr Dennis); George E. Wahlen VA Medical Center, Department of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah (Dr Wilde Mr Abildskov); Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California (Dr Jacobus); Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology; Bioinformatics Interdepartmental Program; Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California (Dr Yang); Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, Bioinformatics Interdepartmental Program, University of California, Los Angeles, California (Mr Cheng); San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego, California (Mr Delfel); Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California (Dr Hesselink); Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, School of Medicine; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Utah, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah(Dr Bigler); and Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego; Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California (Dr Max).

Insights

Pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) did not show lasting neurocognitive differences compared to children with orthopedic injuries or no injuries after accounting for confounding factors. Careful control group selection and adjustment for demographics are crucial in mTBI research.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric neurology
  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental psychology

Background:

  • Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is common in children, but its long-term effects on neurocognitive functioning remain a subject of investigation.
  • Understanding these effects is crucial for appropriate clinical management and educational support.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate potential differences in neurocognitive functioning between children with pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and control groups.
  • To assess the impact of demographic, socioeconomic, and genetic factors on these potential differences.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study.
  • Comparison of 450 children with mTBI against 1604 children with orthopedic injury (OI) and 9814 children with no injury (NI).
  • Neurocognitive performance assessed using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and Little Man Task, with analyses adjusted for multiple confounders.

Main Results:

  • Unadjusted analyses initially indicated higher cognitive scores in children with mTBI compared to the no-injury group.
  • After adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and genetic factors, no significant differences in General Ability, Executive Function, or Learning/Memory were found between mTBI and control groups.
  • Sensitivity analyses controlling for behavior and white matter microstructure yielded consistent findings.

Conclusions:

  • Pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is not associated with significant neurocognitive differences when accounting for key confounding variables.
  • The study underscores the critical importance of controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and genetic factors in research on pediatric mTBI.
  • Appropriate selection of control groups is essential for accurate interpretation of neurocognitive outcomes in pediatric mTBI studies.
Abstract