Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
Published on: October 13, 2023
Regularized Cross-Sectional Network Modeling with Missing Data: A Comparison of Methods
1Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
This study compares methods for handling missing data in network modeling using the graphical lasso (glasso). The expectation-maximization algorithm with cross-validation demonstrated the best performance for psychological network analysis.
Area of Science:
- Network Science
- Psychological Measurement
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Network modeling is crucial for analyzing psychological variables, often using the regularized Gaussian graphical model (GGM) with the graphical lasso (glasso).
- Existing methods for handling missing data with glasso are underdeveloped, limiting the use of efficient data collection designs.
- Planned missing data designs can reduce participant burden but require robust missing data handling techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare three distinct approaches for handling missing data within the graphical lasso framework.
- To evaluate the performance of these methods under varying simulation conditions, including sample size and missing data proportions.
- To provide practical guidance for researchers analyzing psychological network data with missing observations.
Main Methods:
- A two-stage estimation approach using a saturated covariance matrix prior to glasso.
- Single-stage approaches combining glasso with the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, utilizing either EBIC or cross-validation for tuning parameter selection.
- A simulation study assessing performance across different sample sizes, missing data proportions, and network structures, supplemented by a real-world data example.
Main Results:
- The expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm combined with cross-validation for tuning parameter selection performed optimally among the evaluated methods.
- All three compared methods showed viability, particularly in scenarios with larger sample sizes and lower proportions of missing data.
- The study identified practical considerations for selecting appropriate missing data handling techniques in psychological network analysis.
Conclusions:
- The EM algorithm with cross-validation offers a promising strategy for addressing missing data in graphical lasso network analyses.
- Researchers should consider sample size and missing data prevalence when choosing a method for psychological network analysis.
- Further methodological development is warranted to enhance the handling of missing data in complex network models.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...

