Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

529
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
529
Truncation in Survival Analysis01:09

Truncation in Survival Analysis

580
Truncation in survival analysis refers to the exclusion of individuals or events from the dataset based on specific criteria related to the time of the event. This exclusion can happen in two primary forms: left truncation and right truncation.
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
580
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.3K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.3K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

364
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
364
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

398
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
398
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

561
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
561

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ultrasound-Informed State Estimation of Wrist Tremor Dynamics via Koopman Operator for Personalized Sensory Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

Using large language models to enhance clinically-driven missing data recovery algorithms in electronic health records.

JAMIA open·2026
Same author

Higher educational attainment in Huntington disease families: evidence from the Enroll-HD study.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2026
Same author

SPARCC: Semi-Parametric Robust Estimation in a Right-Censored Covariate Model.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same author

Wearable Ultrasound Sensing with Dual Arrays and Machine Learning for Real-Time Tremor Characterization and Antagonist Muscle Monitoring.

IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement·2026
Same author

Testing and Quantifying Site-Level Variability in Diagnostic Sensitivity of an Anchor Variable.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.1K

Extrapolation before imputation reduces bias when imputing censored covariates.

Sarah C Lotspeich1,2, Tanya P Garcia2

  • 1Department of Statistical Sciences, Wake Forest University Winston-Salem, NC, U.S.A.

Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics : a Joint Publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America
|September 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new imputation method to reduce bias in Huntington's disease clinical trials. The extrapolation-before-imputation approach improves subject identification for trials by accurately modeling symptom progression.

Keywords:
Adaptive quadratureBreslow’s estimatorConditional mean imputationHuntington’s diseaseTime to diagnosisTrapezoidal rule

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:16

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

532

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.1K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:16

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

532

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Neurodegenerative Diseases

Background:

  • Modeling symptom progression in Huntington's disease (HD) clinical trials is challenging due to censored time-to-diagnosis data.
  • Existing imputation methods for censored covariates exhibit over 200% bias under heavy censoring, hindering accurate subject selection.
  • Current methods inadequately estimate the survival function tail, leading to significant bias in conditional mean calculations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel imputation strategy that minimizes bias in modeling censored time-to-diagnosis for Huntington's disease clinical trials.
  • To improve the identification of ideal subjects for clinical trials by accurately estimating conditional means of censored covariates.
  • To provide a robust method for approximating integrals of survival functions beyond observed data.

Main Methods:

  • Combining semiparametric survival estimators with a parametric extension to approximate survival function integrals to infinity.
  • Implementing an extrapolation-before-imputation approach to address bias caused by heavy censoring.
  • Utilizing simulations to evaluate the performance of the proposed method against existing imputation techniques.

Main Results:

  • The proposed extrapolation-before-imputation method significantly reduces bias compared to existing imputation methods, even with misspecified parametric extensions.
  • The approach effectively approximates the integral of the survival function up to infinity, overcoming limitations of previous methods.
  • Demonstrated utility in prioritizing subjects for Huntington's disease clinical trials through corrected conditional mean imputation.

Conclusions:

  • The developed imputation method offers a substantial improvement for modeling censored data in Huntington's disease research.
  • Accurate imputation of time-to-diagnosis can enhance the efficiency and validity of clinical trial subject selection.
  • The R code is available to facilitate the reproduction and application of these findings in future research.