Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

06:40
Activity-based Training on a Treadmill with Spinal Cord Injured Wistar Rats
Published on: January 16, 2019
8.4K
Locomotor Recovery in Spinal Cord Injury Can Be Assessed Using Weight-Bearing.
Courtney A Bannerman1, Mitra Knezic1, Julia P Segal1
1Department of Biomedical & Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Journal of Neurotrauma
|September 22, 2025
Summary
The Advanced Dynamic Weight Bearing (ADWB) system offers an objective method to assess locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI). This observer-independent approach correlates well with traditional scales, improving research reproducibility.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Rehabilitation Science
Background:
- Spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs locomotor function, necessitating reliable outcome measures.
- Current gold-standard scales (Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan; Basso Mouse Scale) are observer-dependent, potentially introducing bias.
- Observer-independent methods are crucial for enhancing reproducibility and reducing bias in SCI research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the Advanced Dynamic Weight Bearing (ADWB) system as an observer-independent method for assessing locomotor recovery after contusive SCI in rodents.
- To determine if ADWB measurements correlate with established observer-dependent scales.
Main Methods:
- Contusive spinal cord injury (SCI) was induced in rodents.
- Locomotor recovery was assessed using the Advanced Dynamic Weight Bearing (ADWB) system to measure weight distribution and surface area.
- Weight-bearing changes were analyzed over time and correlated with Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) scores.
Main Results:
- Early after SCI, mice exhibited altered weight distribution, shifting weight to front paws and trunk/tail, with reduced rear paw usage.
- As recovery progressed, weight shifted away from front paws, but did not return to pre-injury levels.
- ADWB-measured changes in weight distribution strongly correlated with BMS scores, indicating its validity.
Conclusions:
- The ADWB system provides a viable, observer-independent method for quantifying locomotor recovery after SCI.
- This objective approach can reduce bias and improve the reproducibility of SCI research.
- ADWB measurements reflect injury severity and functional recovery, complementing traditional assessment scales.
Related Concept Videos
Spinal Cord Injury ll: Pathophysiology
Spinal cord injury progresses through two interconnected phases: primary injury and secondary injury.Primary InjuryPrimary injury happens at the moment of trauma and involves immediate mechanical damage to the spinal cord.Compression happens when broken vertebrae, herniated discs, or accumulating blood (such as a hematoma) press directly against the spinal cord, distorting its normal shape and function. In cases of contusion, the cord is bruised by a blunt force (like penetrating injuries or...
Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology
Early Ischemia and Ionic ImbalanceWithin minutes of spinal cord injury, a secondary cascade begins, progressing over hours to weeks. Vascular damage reduces blood flow, causing ischemia and mitochondrial dysfunction. ATP depletion leads to ion pump failure, membrane depolarization, sodium influx, potassium efflux, and water accumulation, resulting in cellular swelling. Increased intracellular calcium further disrupts mitochondria and accelerates cellular injury.Excitotoxicity and Neuronal...

